Aliasing looking_away_from_viewer → looking_away
Link to alias

Reason:

There are only 6 images with the tag "looking_away_from_viewer" and by looking at them, they are nothing different to "looking_away" tag.

*Bump*

Better fix that manually. If the aliased name was a simpler term, with great probability of be mistagged again, would be a diffetent story.

Looking at the tag history it's so rarely tagged that an alias is frankly unnecessary.

Furrin_Gok said:
Looking at the tag history it's so rarely tagged that an alias is frankly unnecessary.

If you actually counted you would've gotten around 100, I don't think that's "not unnecessary", if there's already about 100 then they will be more.

FurryLover001 said:
If you actually counted you would've gotten around 100.

There's only 22. You must've counted all of the unrelated tag changes.
...though those 22 were tagged by over dozen users. Which is surprising. Unless they're alts.

Genjar said:
There's only 22. You must've counted all of the unrelated tag changes.
...though those 22 were tagged by over dozen users. Which is surprising. Unless they're alts.

So you're saying as in users that tried to add a tag which was already there in the tag list?

FurryLover001 said:
[…] I don't think that's "not unnecessary", […]

What?

O16 said:
What?

The tags occured over the span of years, not months. THey're spread out enough that they're an easy manual fix.

Furrin_Gok said:
The tags occured over the span of years, not months. THey're spread out enough that they're an easy manual fix.

No. I am talking about that triple negation. If I am not wrong, the only language in which consecutive negations are used is the portuguese.