Aliasing after_transformation → post_transformation
Link to alias

Reason:

possibly also after_vore → post_vore

We seem to prefer after_* tags to post_* ones in general, so having this/these alias around seems a good idea (there's a small, but regular trickle of stuff in after_transformation).

Circeus said:
Aliasing after_transformation → post_transformation
Link to alias

Reason:

possibly also after_vore → post_vore

We seem to prefer after_* tags to post_* ones in general, so having this/these alias around seems a good idea (there's a small, but regular trickle of stuff in after_transformation).

So, reverse the alias? "We prefer after_* tags to post_*•.

Siral_Exan said:
So, reverse the alias? "We prefer after_* tags to post_*•.

No he's saying we normally prefer after_*, but these two tags are the exception to that general rule.

Actually I wouldn't mind a reversal at all. The only reason I proposed the alias this way is that the presence of another alias (post-tranformation) prevents me from properly suggesting an alias to after_transformation anyway!

Circeus said:
Actually I wouldn't mind a reversal at all. The only reason I proposed the alias this way is that the presence of another alias (post-tranformation) prevents me from properly suggesting an alias to after_transformation anyway!

Usually, I am in favor of padronization, but since "post_vore" and "post_transformation" are so much popular when compared with their "after_*" variations, maybe would be better to maintain them as the main tags.