Implicating bodyjob → sex
Link to implication

Reason:

Most *job tags are already implicated to sex.

I considered couple of other implications such as bodyjob -> size_difference. But there could be rare exceptions, such as if the characters are of the same size but one of them has a hyper penis (large enough to receive a bodyjob).

There's also a hugjob tag, which seems to overlap a lot with this.. Might need an alias for that.

EDIT: The tag implication bodyjob -> sex (forum #222951) has been approved by @slyroon.

Genjar said:
Implicating bodyjob → sex
Link to implication

Reason:

Most *job tags are already implicated to sex.

I considered couple of other implications such as bodyjob -> size_difference. But there could be rare exceptions, such as if the characters are of the same size but one of them has a hyper penis (large enough to receive a bodyjob).

There's also a hugjob tag, which seems to overlap a lot with this.. Might need an alias for that.

+1
Seems like an open and shut case,
Nice going dood ╹‿╹)

Genjar said:
Implicating bodyjob → sex
Link to implication

Reason:

Most *job tags are already implicated to sex.

I considered couple of other implications such as bodyjob -> size_difference. But there could be rare exceptions, such as if the characters are of the same size but one of them has a hyper penis (large enough to receive a bodyjob).

There's also a hugjob tag, which seems to overlap a lot with this.. Might need an alias for that.

Hubjob is not always a bodyjob, but a bodyjob is usually a hugjob. I don't think we should be removing hugjob just because it's also a body job--If the character is also wrapping their arms around the penis, it's still a hugjob too.

+1 this makes solid sense to me, and hugjob has already been aliased to bodyjob.

The tag implication bodyjob -> sex (forum #222951) has been approved by @slyroon.