Right now its bad enough that everything is catch all under pussy but the fact that in the cases of artwork depicting very visible labia minora as such as

post #1143230 or post #1155550 and I'm sure thousands of other images.

You can't search for this feature in specific or remove it from the search if you want to see a specific type of humanoid vulva.

I vote to have it removed from alias so it can be properly tagged.

Using terms like visible_labia_minora feels awkward and clumsy at best but its the only option right now. While labia minora do implicate a pussy/vulva is there, labia_minora doesn't mean vulva, just like intact_foreskin doesn't mean penis but implicates a penis being there.

Sometimes you want to search for a pussy that looks like this
post #1154258 or post #1153508

Sometimes you want to look for ones that look like this
post #1155561 post #1153312

And you cant do that as it stands right now because searching labia_minora pulls up everything under pussy including vulvas that look like this:
post #1155563 or post #1152072

I think I proposed using visible_labia_minora in the other thread.

If this happens, realize that you have over 220,000 images, if not a lot more, to evaluate. That's one hell of a tagging project.

Lance_Armstrong said:
I think I proposed using visible_labia_minora in the other thread.

If this happens, realize that you have over 220,000 images, if not a lot more, to evaluate. That's one hell of a tagging project.

Yeah thats actually why I brought this up, when I went to go search the tag I noticed the shorter labia_minora.

And yeah I know its a huge tagging project but it is a notable issue. Not a priority one perhaps but still I felt it was worth noting