Topic: Poképhilliac test (How bad have you got it?)

Posted under Off Topic

Go here: http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_by_National_Pok%C3%A9dex_number

and open up a word document. List every Pokémon you would ever seriously consider having sex with and then hit the "word count" button to get the total number of Pokémon.

What is your number and the percentage?

Mine is 65/655 ~ 9.2% of all known Pokémon.

Rankings by # of Pokémon:

0-9 = Quite normal
10-19 = Novice Poképhilliac
20-29 = Pokémon Master ifyouknowwhatimean.jpg
30-39 = Kinda creepy
40-49 = Approaching "Ashchu Adventures" levels of perversion
50+ = Mother of Arceus, you need to get laid, like NOW!

Edit* Anthro is allowed, Ginjenka isn't.

Updated by Eevee-E

So you mean like, stock, feral, un-anthropomorphized Pokémon?

0.

Updated by anonymous

KloH0und said:
So you mean like, stock, feral, un-anthropomorphized Pokémon?

0.

Anthro is okay, but Ginjenka is cheating.

Updated by anonymous

KloH0und said:
So you mean like, stock, feral, un-anthropomorphized Pokémon?

0.

Some of the stock pokemon are pretty anthro. Like Zoroark, Mienshao, Sawk/Throh, the hitmon*s, Mr. Mime, Jynx, Gardevoir, etc.

Then again, I'm not a fan of the idea of banging anything that can't talk. Seems kind of rapey. And pokemon-speak does not count as talking. But sometimes psychic-types are shown as capable of communicating with humans, so...
*realization*
why the fuck are we even having this discussion i dont even

Edit: oh, anthro is okay? Uh...lots. Lots/655

Updated by anonymous

If they're Mystery Dungeon level anthropomorphized, so they all pass this test I would say about 133/655 ~20% Unsurprisingly the higher generation, the lower is the percentage.

Though I would consider fucking some others just for science. Ice-cream sex, how does it work?

Updated by anonymous

I found it faster to list those I wouldn't have sex with.

Result: Your scale needs to go higher.

List:
krabby
kingler
unown
qwilfish
lileep
cradily
burmy
wormadam
cherubi
chatot
probopass
stunfisk

Edit: Oh, and non-antrho, all of them. If they were antrho I'd probably add all those to the list. Maybe not Unown.

Updated by anonymous

The only way to pass is to not take the test.

post #62708

                  • Grovyle<3

******** Lucario

    • Riolu

There might be more, but that is all I can think of.

Updated by anonymous

After a long... LONG journey through the list...

65/151 from gen. 1
34/100 from gen. 2
32/136 from gen. 3
27/107 from gen. 4
18/156 from gen. 5
176/649 in total.

So their designs ARE getting worse as time goes on. The boner does not lie.
Also, sorry, but I can't percentages.

Updated by anonymous

ippiki_ookami said:
potato

dude... you reeeally need to get laid like NOW

Updated by anonymous

Lucario is the most fuckable Pokemon in all the universe, chestspike notwithstanding. It's like having your own pet samurai who has magic and a permanent fuzzy blanket.

Updated by anonymous

Foobaria said:
Lucario is the most fuckable Pokemon in all the universe, chestspike notwithstanding. It's like having your own pet samurai who has magic and a permanent fuzzy blanket.

Well yeah, if you ignore the chestspike...but I like not getting stabbed during sex. That's kind of important for me. You might even call it a fetish, because I can't get off without it.

Updated by anonymous

FatherOfGray said:
Anthro is okay, but Ginjenka is cheating.

Please define the word "Ginjenka." Google is of no assistance.

Snowy said:
Some of the stock pokemon are pretty anthro.

Not anthro enough.

Even if you do anthropomorphize them, I'm not particularly interested in the idea of having sex with something just because they are (based on) a type of Pokemon. All I'd care about is if they're attractive in a general sense.

Updated by anonymous

Snowy said:
Well yeah, if you ignore the chestspike...but I like not getting stabbed during sex. That's kind of important for me. You might even call it a fetish, because I can't get off without it.

A cork set would help with the spikes. =~.^=

Updated by anonymous

KloH0und said:
Please define the word "Ginjenka." Google is of no assistance.

Ginjenka (I might actually be spelling it wrong) is pictures or photos of humans in clothing, armor, or costume that make them appear to be a certain Pokémon.

Updated by anonymous

FatherOfGray said:
Ginjenka (I might actually be spelling it wrong) is pictures or photos of humans in clothing, armor, or costume that make them appear to be a certain Pokémon.

Cosplay?

Updated by anonymous

I remember back in my day when kids only had 150 pokemon >:| I don't care for new pokemans.

I'd say arcanine would be the only do-able one out of the bunch if it was "anthrofied"

Updated by anonymous

ArdesCadaver said:
After a long... LONG journey through the list...

65/151 from gen. 1
34/100 from gen. 2
32/136 from gen. 3
27/107 from gen. 4
18/156 from gen. 5
176/649 in total.

So their designs ARE getting worse as time goes on. The boner does not lie.
Also, sorry, but I can't percentages.

You mean you can't divide one number by the other and multiply the result by 100? Mmm kay then. I won't judge.

Updated by anonymous

Xch3l said:
Cosplay?

Not quite. Its not dressing as a certain pokemon, but rather dressing so that they appear to share some qualities. Sometimes it's sort of a cosplay-esque aesthetic, but if it is, it's usually a creative one. The best ones (IMO) are the ones that look like they aren't trying. Like this, or this , or this. I had some really awesome ones in my old laptop, too. Might try to save those off the hard drive. I seem to remember finding most of them on a thread in SA, but SA is in a mood at the moment, so eh.

So sort of like cosplay, only the aim is to evoke the pokemon (or whatever), not to look like one.

Updated by anonymous

Snowy said:
Not quite. Its not dressing as a certain pokemon, but rather dressing so that they appear to share some qualities. Sometimes it's sort of a cosplay-esque aesthetic, but if it is, it's usually a creative one. The best ones (IMO) are the ones that look like they aren't trying. Like this, or this , or this. I had some really awesome ones in my old laptop, too. Might try to save those off the hard drive. I seem to remember finding most of them on a thread in SA, but SA is in a mood at the moment, so eh.

So sort of like cosplay, only the aim is to evoke the pokemon (or whatever), not to look like one.

Then its more like a personification? uhhh... my head hurts

Updated by anonymous

Taking anthros into account
Gen 1 45/151 29%
Gen 2 21/100 21%
Gen 3 12/136 8%
Gen 4 15/107 14%
Gen 5 0/156 (because I haven't played it)
Total 93/647 strike that 93/491 19%

Updated by anonymous

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Bonus question:

How many pokemons from here you would fuck?

I don't think that you fuck them so much as you get fucked by them.

And not in the good way. More in the way that you get fucked by Cthulhu when he awakens.

Updated by anonymous

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Bonus question:

How many pokemons from here you would fuck?

2, Charizard 'M and Glitchy Charizard. I've seen a really hot picture of these two fucking before.

Updated by anonymous

FatherOfGray said:
2, Charizard 'M and Glitchy Charizard. I've seen a really hot picture of these two fucking before.

I keep trying to imagine what that would sound like, and I keep thinking "Dial-up noises."

Updated by anonymous

1) Magnemite
2) Geodude
3) Probopass
4) Duskull
5) Voltorb
6) Bronzor
7) Pineco
8) Baltoy
9) Unknown

Hey! I'm "Quite Normal"!

Updated by anonymous

Lucario. ED says it best:

"The Krystal of the Pokémon fandom, Lucario are a breed of Pokémon. Much like Krystal, Lucario is lusted after by almost every furfag in the world. The fact that the male ones have the voice of a black man doesn't help the weeaboos who want that giant black cock up their buttholes. Seriously, every furry in existence wants to fuck the male ones in their furry asses and vice versa, even the straight ones. Cynthia wields a Lucario as she does her father's penis. Ew."

Updated by anonymous

AdmiralSpicyweiner said:
Lucario. ED says it best:

"The Krystal of the Pokémon fandom."

For now there are about equal number of pikachu rating:e, and lucario rating:e pics here. So lucario isn't independent leader (at least here).

Updated by anonymous

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
For now there are about equal number of pikachu rating:e, and lucario rating:e pics here. So lucario isn't independent leader (at least here).

Considering that Lucario has existed for a shorter period of time than Pikachu, I'd say that makes him the more sexualized one.

Updated by anonymous

Math time with Snowy

Assuming e621 has a reasonably representative sample of images, and defining "relative abundance" as the number of posts on e621 tagged with the character, and "time-adjusted relative abundance" as the relative abundance divided by the days since first public release:
Pikachu has been public since at least 1996-02-27 (release of Red and Green). It has a relative abundance (# of explicit posts on e621) of 1137, and a time-adjusted relative abundance 0.18. Lucario has been public since at least 2005-07-16 (release of the movie with Lucario in it), and has a relative abundance of 1153, for a time-adjusted relative abundance of 0.41. That's ~2.3 explicit Lucario pictures per explicit Pikachu picture (adjusted for how long each character has ben around). there are e621's sample may be skewed. Lucario appeared in advertising before the movie was released, but I can't be arsed to track down the date that Lucario first featured in ads, and I believe that Pikachu also featured in ads before the release of Red and Green. The advertising isn't going to mess with that ratio very much (what's a few months over more than half a decade?), and I don't think that e621's archives are *that* skewed towards Lucario over Pikachu. So I feel pretty safe in concluding that Lucario is much more sexualized than Pikachu.

I don't want to write this paper. What should I do for fun instead? I should analyze the relative popularity of pokemon porn!

sometimes my methods of procrastination scare me

Updated by anonymous

I like the feral one's better than the anthro's. But I'm too lazy to count.
Basically, all Eeveelutions(Leafeon <3) Delcatty, Vulpix, Arcanine...You catch my drift.

Updated by anonymous

I'm no mathematician, but I think for me the question isn't which Pokemon would I seriously consider having sex with, but instead it's what Pokemon would I NOT have sex with. The corresponding percentage for the latter would probably be pretty low... my life sucks T^T

Updated by anonymous

So if I or anyone else counts over 150, does that mean we would be Pokemon Masters?

Updated by anonymous

Ponyta
Rapidash
Flaaffy
Ampharos
Girafarig
Stantler
Blaziken
Gardevoir
Altaria
Milotic
Lopunny
Cresselia
Shaymin
Blitzle
Zebstrika
Swanna
Deerling
Sawsbuck
Virizion
Keldeo

basically anithing vaguely humanoid or with hooves

Updated by anonymous

...... it looks like I was a Pokémon Master and close to the next level :3

Updated by anonymous

I don't know all the existing Pokémon, but this is my list so far (all the Pokémon in the following list should be interpreted as female, even if his gender is not determined, in case of the legendary Pokémon)

- Gardevoir
- Lucario
- Bayleef
- Lapras
- Lugia
- Mienshao
- Grovyle
- Sceptile
- Arbok (anthro, if posible)
- Virizion

AND my four favorites (whom I like to call them "The fappeable Elite Four") are:

- Zoroark
- Blaziken
- Lopunny
- Weavile

So, 14/655 = 2,14%. Is not that bad...

Updated by anonymous

No i was talking about the guy who stared this also y'all people are serious child cartoon rapist have fun raping cartoon characters

Updated by anonymous

No i was talking about the guy who stared this also y'all people are serious child cartoon rapist have fun raping cartoon characters

Updated by anonymous

lucariobreeder said:
No i was talking about the guy who stared this also y'all people are serious child cartoon rapist have fun raping cartoon characters

Well, whatever. Good riddance.

Updated by anonymous

lucariobreeder said:
No i was talking about the guy who stared this also y'all people are serious child cartoon rapist have fun raping cartoon characters

Pot meet kettle...

Updated by anonymous

Renard_Queenston said:

GO AWAY

that is not an acceptable way to treat people here

Updated by anonymous

Assuming they're up for it and have compatible genitals...
Gen 1: 51/151 34%
Gen 2: 30/100 30%
Gen 3: 29/135 21%
Gen 4: 37/107 34%
Gen 5: 32/156 20%
Gen 6: 21/72 29%
Gen 7: 16/81 19%
So that's 215/802 27% So that's over a quarter of all pokemon!
All of them un-anthro'd, a couple of them are fish, bugs, birds and plants and a fair amount of them not even female... (male Meowstic makes me very excited)
Problems... those be the things that I have...

I don't think I'm this bad with everything... Pokemon's just sorta my thing...

Updated by anonymous

128/655

I've got it severely.

I can't list all of them, so let me just put down my favorites (all females):

Lucario

Zoroark

Mewtwo

Ninetales

Pyroar

Liepard

Arcanine

Ditto

Braixen

Sylveon

Charizard

Salamence

Lugia

Suicune

Lopunny

Persian

Noivern

Haxorous

Salazzle

Vaporeon

Updated by anonymous

I'm enough of a pervert that very few of these Pokémon are actually unappealing to me. However, I'm immediately objecting to Slugma and Magcargo for fear of being burned, the cocoon Pokémon for (seeming) lack of interactive parts, Gulpin and Swalot because I'm not into vore, and Trubbish and Garbodor because I'm pretty sure Lance wants them all and I'm okay with that.

Updated by anonymous

The only ones that I can think of that I really don't want to do anything with them are mostly those "brand new" gen1 evolutions from gen4, but other than that I can pretty much get to hump anything thrown at me, minus a few exception.

Basically, it would be faster if I list the ones I would never touch :
- Gen4 new evolutions for old gen1 Pokemon
- Conkeldurr
- Volcanion

Everything else gets a pass with me, but some more than others. There are a lot of them that I'm mostly neutral, but I wouldn't mind anyway, and if I exclude them from the list, I would be closer to really like 75% of them total and not 99%

Updated by anonymous

Neitsuke said:
Everything else gets a pass with me, but some more than others.

Would you fuck a Voltorb?

Updated by anonymous

Strikerman said:
Would you fuck a Voltorb?

how much are you willing to pay someone to find a way to have sex with a sentient, explosive sphere that shoots electricity at people

Updated by anonymous

Fenrick said:
how much are you willing to pay someone to find a way to have sex with a sentient, explosive sphere that shoots electricity at people

A lot more than I would pay for the Electrode since Voltorb has no mouth. With Electrode you could just use a rubber.

Updated by anonymous

I remember many years ago I actually wanted to make like, a web-based thing that was basically a "would/wouldn't/maybe" list similar to this concept.
It would then pool all the answers people had given and have like, a top 10 list of most fuckable, least fuckable, etc. and display them somewhere for people to see.

But then I remembered I only know basic HTML. ;v;

(If anyone wants to use this idea to do something like it, go right ahead, and totally let me know if you do :D)

Updated by anonymous

The problem with that clause about anthro forms is that Elpatrixf has drawn anthrofied versions of almost every Pokemon, and he has a way of making pretty much all of them attractive.

Updated by anonymous

7,7%
Huh, Looks like I wasn't that much deep in the pokephilia

But come on, Zoroark and Lucario are so alluring it's cheating from them-

Updated by anonymous

I came up with 49, one under, so I'm not a total deviant right?? Also I find it hilarious, and it says a lot about our culture, that wanting to fuck anywhere from 0-9 pokemon makes you quite normal.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1
  • 2