Implicating deep_throat → oral_penetration
Link to implication

Reason:

This act obligatorily involves the oral insertion of a penis, dildo etc.

EDIT: The tag implication deep_throat -> oral_penetration (forum #227093) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Bump. I say this is a valid implication. +1

What if a character's neck was shown, but not their mouth? Would that qualify as deep_throat still, or just neck_bulge?

furrin_gok said:
What if a character's neck was shown, but not their mouth? Would that qualify as deep_throat still, or just neck_bulge?

if there's heavy evidence that a character is being penetated a certain way than the tag applies. for example anal_penetration applies for male characters if there's enough clues (hips touching, looking pleasured, etc) even if the actual penetration is obscured by the characters' bodies or an object.

there are going to be cases where there's some ambiguity as to what caused a neck_bulge, but in the situations where we can determine it's deep_throat it's going to be oral_penetration. _{(unless we count penetrating the neck hole of a dullahan or something, but that probably shouldn't)}

The tag implication deep_throat -> oral_penetration (forum #227093) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

The bulk update request #6084 is active.

remove implication deep_throat (23029) -> oral (300391)
create implication deep_throat (23029) -> oral_penetration (101053)

Reason: For some reason, this was implied to oral, but not oral_penetration. Given there is no possible way penetration could not be involved, this should be fixed.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6084 (forum #385388) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6084 (forum #385388) has been approved by @slyroon.