For the short of it, I've recently been going through and adding different *_(gem) and treasure-oriented tags to posts. While doing some of this tagging I noticed that pearl_necklace wasn't implicated to pearl_(gem). Before submitting an implication suggestion I decided to check their wiki articles, and this is what was written for pearl_necklace:

Cum on the neck, in the cleavage chest or breast.

For an actual necklace made of pearls, use the tags pearl_(gem) and necklace.

Related tags

• titfuck
• cum between breasts
• cum on chest

More info

• Wikipedia

I searched for posts with pearl_necklace and most of them had a literal pearl_necklace, though there were also many posts that had the kind of pearl_necklace as described in the wiki.

Currently the pearl_necklace tag technically can't have pearl_(gem) implicated to it based on the wiki definition, so I'm wondering what do? Should the current wiki be edited to encompass both, or should two new tags be made for both kinds of pearl_necklace used?

Related: https://e621.net/forum/show/200651

Basically: change it to cum_on_neck & related.
Should we have the tag pearl necklace at all, though...?

Birthday_Rat_Siral said:
Related: https://e621.net/forum/show/200651

Basically: change it to cum_on_neck & related.
Should we have the tag pearl necklace at all, though...?

Which do you mean? Are you talking about removing the current definition for pearl_necklace, or removing the tag altogether?

After reading the related forum post, I feel the sexual definition should be replaced with the jewelry definition and the necessary posts re-tagged accordingly (with cum_on_neck, etc). I feel the jewelry definition of pearl_necklace is definitely worth keeping though, seeing how much it's used and it's own distinctness from the pearl_(gem) tag.

Yeah, pearl jewelry seems distinct enough to tag.
And it's not like anyone's used the pearl_necklace tag for cum in ages, so it seems easiest to just fix the wiki and sort out the few old cum_on_neck posts. ...the wiki entry is from 2009, and shouldn't have survived this long.

Genjar said:
Yeah, pearl jewelry seems distinct enough to tag.
And it's not like anyone's used the pearl_necklace tag for cum in ages, so it seems easiest to just fix the wiki and sort out the few old cum_on_neck posts. ...the wiki entry is from 2009, and shouldn't have survived this long.

I had prepared it to be modified but wanted confirmation from someone more experienced than me. I ain't too good with jewelry tags...