Aliasing monobrow → unibrow
Link to alias

Reason:

+1

+1. Apparently it is fine.

OK, this seems obvious to you and me, but write a reason wouldn't rip out your arms (if you have one or both of your arms partially or completely absent and feel offended by my comment, then I apologize).

O16 said:
... but write a reason wouldn't rip out your arms ...

Care to rephrase this?

Reason:

Because they mean the same thi- *rip* AH FUCK!! MY ARM!!!

Birthday_Rat_Siral said:
Care to rephrase this?

'Rip out' is an actual expression like 'burn out' or 'climb up'; it means: brutally remove part of something/someone, usually using a dull blade and/or immense strength.

O16 said:
'Rip out' is an actual expression like 'burn out' or 'climb up'; it means: brutally remove part of something/someone, usually using a dull blade and/or immense strength.

"Climb up...?" The only of these three phrases that I've ever heard is "Burn out."

O16 said:
+1. Apparently it is fine.

OK, this seems obvious to you and me, but write a reason wouldn't rip out your arms (if you have one or both of your arms partially or completely absent and feel offended by my comment, then I apologize).

might i suggest not being rude about it, there are better ways making your displeasure clear without being rude>> i admit a reason was in order now and was considering the retify that after it -one of my first alias suggestions- was revived after over 7 months thru you responded before i could.

as for why, i was basing it off other common structures and systems at the time that normally come in both singular and dualististic forms, among them: unicycle, unicameral, unipedal, uniball and others. Thru given that mono- and uni- differentiate only in the fact that one is rooted in the greek while the other is rooted in latin, something that is kinda irrelevant to e621 tagging. it really is just a matter of taste at this point.
I have also wanted to have all characters and creatures that are visibly born with a single eye to have unieye tagged to it but most people seem to favor the less specific one_eye...

PS: the wikipedia article to this anatomical feature does make use of both terms.

Ruku said:
might i suggest not being rude about it, there are better ways making your displeasure clear without being rude>> i admit a reason was in order now and was considering the retify that after it -one of my first alias suggestions- was revived after over 7 months thru you responded before i could.

Sorry, I was just trying to be emphatic, really don't meant to be rude.
I guess that understand you, I also did some mistakes in my first suggestions.

Ruku said:
as for why, i was basing it off other common structures and systems at the time that normally come in both singular and dualististic forms, among them: unicycle, unicameral, unipedal, uniball and others. Thru given that mono- and uni- differentiate only in the fact that one is rooted in the greek while the other is rooted in latin, something that is kinda irrelevant to e621 tagging. it really is just a matter of taste at this point.
I have also wanted to have all characters and creatures that are visibly born with a single eye to have unieye tagged to it but most people seem to favor the less specific one_eye...

Yeah, the etymology of words doesn't seems to be soo important in this site, since 'humanoid' and 'anthropomorphic' are largely used as if they meant distinct things, despite of technically being synonyms.

p.s. If I am not wrong, you owe me a biology discussion; and what does ">>" means in this context?.

O16 said:
p.s. If I am not wrong, you owe me a biology discussion; and what does ">>" means in this context?.

biology discussion, how so?

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/i8LOLswfTkQ/mqdefault.jpg

Ruku said:
biology discussion, how so?

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/i8LOLswfTkQ/mqdefault.jpg

And you didn't answered my question.

O16 said:

Extracted from here

And you didn't answered my question.

Ruku said:
would like to discuss this but that would be totally off topic to what we are supposed to be discussing here.

And i did anwser your question, you asked what ">>" means, i linked you to the general expression it denotes.

Ruku said:
And i did anwser your question, you asked what ">>" means, i linked you to the general expression it denotes.

Emoticons are sometimes hard to spot when they don't have a mouth. >_> ಠ ̯ ಠ

BlueDingo said:
Emoticons are sometimes hard to spot when they don't have a mouth. <_<

i guess, http://thenewinquiry.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/essays_HELLOKITTY_jason-han.jpg

Ruku said:
And i did anwser your question, you asked what ">>" means, i linked you to the general expression it denotes.

Oh... so that was what you meant. I didn't linked the emoticon to the expression because I didn't even noticed it was an emoticon; actually I thought if was the much-greater-than sign (used to state that X is dozens of times greater than Y through the following structure: X >> Y).

BlueDingo said:
Emoticons are sometimes hard to spot when they don't have a mouth. >_> ಠ ̯ ಠ

Exactly.

To @Ruku: you said that wasn't the proper time and place for such discussion, but we may contact each other in order to it.