Topic: Tag Implication: virgin_killer_sweater -> sweater

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

About CKB... does it get tagged separately in images with a character wearing cat_lingerie, or just where only the bra part is visible?

(And CL would also need to be implicated to meme_apparel, while I'm here.)

Updated by anonymous

memeboy said:
implicate the "maga" hat to it too while you are At It (edit: is there even a tag for the hat)

Not aware of what you are talking about. Care to give an example?

Updated by anonymous

memeboy said:
implicate the "maga" hat to it too while you are At It (edit: is there even a tag for the hat)

make_america_great_again

Found one untagged, but there could be more. 6 images seems low.

Would support alias/retag to maga_hat

Updated by anonymous

Lance_Armstrong said:
+1

and Tag Implication: virgin_killer_sweater -> meme_apparel

The virgin killer sweater is an actual item of clothing (and that is it's literal translated name). It's also not much of what you'd call a meme.

Updated by anonymous

notawerewolf said:
The virgin killer sweater is an actual item of clothing (and that is it's literal translated name). It's also not much of what you'd call a meme.

that implication was suggested because it has became a very popular meme to draw characters wearing virgin killer sweaters

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
-1.Sometimes it's got a cat design, but no "keyhole."

cat lingerie is the name of the lingerie set the cat keyhole bra is part of.

Updated by anonymous

Mutisija said:
cat lingerie is the name of the lingerie set the cat keyhole bra is part of.

Then it should be implicated, not aliased.

Updated by anonymous

BlueDingo said:
Then it should be implicated, not aliased.

do we really need separate tags for each piece of this specific lingerie set?

Updated by anonymous

Mutisija said:
do we really need separate tags for each piece of this specific lingerie set?

There is precedent for separate tags for parts of an outfit. There are separate tags for the two parts of a bikini when one but not the other is showing, bikini_top and bikini_bottom, and both are implicated to bikini.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
post #1116093
That does not look like a keyhole to me.

that is not the same lingerie set as what the cat lingerie tag is meant for. look at the cat lingerie tag wiki. also i do not understand how lack of keyhole is preventing from aliasing cat keyhole bra to cat lingerie

Updated by anonymous

imagoober said:
There is precedent for separate tags for parts of an outfit. There are separate tags for the two parts of a bikini when one but not the other is showing, bikini_top and bikini_bottom, and both are implicated to bikini.

well then we should make tags for the bra, the panties and the occasional thigh highs which seems a bit too much for one meme apparel whoch has been tagged for around 250 times

Updated by anonymous

Mutisija said:
that is not the same lingerie set as what the cat lingerie tag is meant for. look at the cat lingerie tag wiki.

It's cat lingerie, therefore, fits the tag perfectly. Whether or not the tag was made for something else, there are other things included.

also i do not understand how lack of keyhole is preventing from aliasing cat keyhole bra to cat lingerie

Think about it: Why should we suddenly delete every single mention of the keyhole's presence in specifically cat-themed lingerie? We shouldn't. Therefore, the alias is bad, but the implication is good.

Updated by anonymous

Furrin_Gok said:
It's cat lingerie, therefore, fits the tag perfectly. Whether or not the tag was made for something else, there are other things included.

no, it does not include all cat themed lingerie. its exclusively meant for this very specific lingerie set
post #820592
but the tag name is misleading and probably should be changed since it does create the impression that its for all cat themed lingerie and it leaves no proper tag for other cat themed lingerie.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1