Implicating scenery → detailed_background
Link to implication

Reason:

Scenery refers to a background that portrays a physical place with great detailation level (something between a detailed_background and a amazing_background).

Related implications:

• amazing_background → scenery.

Edit:

After some discussion has been decided that the following suggestion would be more appropriate:

• Aliasing scenery → scenery_(disambiguation).

EDIT: The tag implication scenery -> detailed_background (forum #217876) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

Alias or disambiguate it instead, since it is completely redundant. Those should be under either detailed_background or amazing_background, plus nature or scenery_porn where applicable.

Genjar said:
Alias it instead, since it is completely redundant.

Isn't scenery a bit more specific though? It usually is used for images that have an outdoor vista, right?

From what I can see, scenery is basically a very detailed version of landscape and similar tags. Wouldn't detailed_background + any environment-based tags (eg detailed_background landscape) work well enough?

O16 said:
amazing_background → scenery.

-1. Some amazing_background images are indoors.

JAKXXX3 said:
Isn't scenery a bit more specific though? It usually is used for images that have an outdoor vista, right?

Like BlueDingo said, those belong under landscape. It follows the same standard as cityscape and other *scape tags.

Genjar said:
Like BlueDingo said, those belong under landscape. It follows the same standard as cityscape and other *scape tags.

Ok, I'm fine with aliasing scenery to landscape.

JAKXXX3 said:
Ok, I'm fine with aliasing scenery to landscape.

-1. scenery contains images outside of landscape's scope (eg. post #1032217 and post #943402). Looks like it will need to be sorted manually.

Here's couple of other tags that are relevant to sorting it:

post #707557 - scenic_view, landscape views from a vantage point.
post #991190 - desolate, barren landscapes.

One place to start would be with scenery -simple_background -detailed_background. Those all need some background tag. I tagscripted some of them, but there's plenty left.

Genjar said:
Alias or disambiguate it instead, since it is completely redundant. Those should be under either detailed_background or amazing_background, plus nature or scenery_porn where applicable.

Sincerely I thought that suggest a desambiguation wouldn't the best idea due the number of posts tagged with "scenery" (> 800), but I guess you are right about that.

BlueDingo said:
Looks like it will need to be sorted manually.

Sigh... Sometimes the most logical decision actually is the hardest to apply. OK then.

The tag implication scenery -> detailed_background (forum #217876) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

This looks really old. I doubt some of these tags have the same usage patterns that they did back then. If anything is still needed, then a fresh discussion might be better. Also the original discussion had basically rejected the OP implication anyways. So I'm just going to reject this one for now.