Implicating covering_chest → covering
Link to implication
Reason:
Since this tag is the non-breast counterpart of covering_breasts, I believe it deserves the same implications, currently just covering.
Kudos to BlueDingo for making the prior tag, I ran into a case where a character did not have breasts, yet were covering the area breasts reside, or covering their chest. Context aside (they're acting that they have breasts/nipples to cover, normally under the bib), they they wouldn't have breasts to cover.
EDIT: The tag implication covering_chest -> covering (forum #229492) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
Updated by auto moderator