Topic: Tag Implication: grub -> larva

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Genjar

Former Staff

Doesn't seem like these are tagged with any consistency. Would probably be better to alias both grub and maggot to larva.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
Doesn't seem like these are tagged with any consistency. Would probably be better to alias both grub and maggot to larva.

considering both wikipedia( https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/grub#Noun ) in regards to grub and the wiki to maggot here consider them synonymous to larva i tend towards a +1 but grub does often also get used in place of food to describe things edible.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar said:
Doesn't seem like these are tagged with any consistency. Would probably be better to alias both grub and maggot to larva.

Better not:

I) Grub and maggot are specific kinds of larva.

I a) Grubs have easily distiguishable head
and legs, but maggots haven't.

I b) Maggots are commonly related to parasitism and putrefaction, but grubs aren't.

II) The tag counting is currently low (<100 for each) so we can easily do the necessary cleaning.

Ruku said:
considering both wikipedia( https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/grub#Noun ) in regards to grub and the wiki to maggot here consider them synonymous to larva i tend towards a +1 but grub does often also get used in place of food to describe things edible.

The term 'grub' is sometimes used as a synonym of 'larva', but they actually don't mean the same; also this usage isn't common either.
If you show to someone a photography of a monarch caterpillar and either ask if it is a larva or ask if it is a grub, you probaly will get distinct answers.

The 'maggot' wiki says that maggot is a larva (what is true), but does not say the terms are synonyms. If I say "scarab is a beetle" I am not saying that 'scarab' and 'beetle' are synonyms.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1