Implicating arwing → spacecraft
Link to implication

Reason:

Arwings are spacecrafts.

Misc:

• I was going to list other spacecrafts (X-Wing, TIE Fighter, etc.) to implicate but their tag numbers are very low right now.
• Why doesn't aircraft imply vehicle yet? Of the list of suggestions posted over 2 years ago in forum #151151, that's the only one that wasn't approved.
• Since we have aircraft and spacecraft tags, should we not also have watercraft (hovercraft, boats, etc.) and landcraft/land_vehicle (cars, bikes, trucks, etc.) tags as well?

EDIT: The tag implication arwing -> spacecraft (forum #233097) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

post #286601 post #674241 post #517379

I suppose the anthro ones are still valid, but what about the legged version? That's in Mario Maker, too. Can you really still consider it a spaceship when it's on legs?

Furrin_Gok said:
post #286601 post #674241 post #517379

I suppose the anthro ones are still valid, but what about the legged version? That's in Mario Maker, too. Can you really still consider it a spaceship when it's on legs?

Well, here's a legitimate question: what defines a spaceship? I don't really care much about Star Fox to get into this, but an appropriate definiton might solve that dilemma.

Siral_Exan said:
Well, here's a legitimate question: what defines a spaceship?

Good question. Without outside information, I'd think that Arwing is some kind of futuristic fighter jet, instead of a spaceship. It looks too flimsy to be spaceworthy. ...unless it's actually depicted as flying in space, such as in post #957678.

Maybe just implicate it to vehicle?

Furrin_Gok said:
Can you really still consider it a spaceship when it's on legs?

An aircraft with legs still counts as aircraft. Why wouldn't a spacecraft also count?

Siral_Exan said:
what defines a spaceship?

The ability to travel through space in a controlled manner (ie. not drifting aimlessly).

Genjar said:
Good question. Without outside information, I'd think that Arwing is some kind of futuristic fighter jet, instead of a spaceship. It looks too flimsy to be spaceworthy. ...unless it's actually depicted as flying in space, such as in post #957678.

Maybe just implicate it to vehicle?

It's a step in the right direction but if you're going by looks alone, wouldn't aircraft be a better choice?

The tag implication arwing -> spacecraft (forum #233097) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.