Implicating compound_eyes → multi_eye
Link to implication

Reason:

Compound eyes in themselves are natural multiple eyes found in various arthropod species; they're all formed from many facets and visual receptors placed together.

Therefore I feel it should naturally have multi_eye as an implicated tag, as compound eyes ARE multiple eyes in themselves. Thoughts?

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Implicating compound_eyes → multi_eye
Link to implication

Reason:

Compound eyes in themselves are natural multiple eyes found in various arthropod species; they're all formed from many facets and visual receptors placed together.

Therefore I feel it should naturally have multi_eye as an implicated tag, as compound eyes ARE multiple eyes in themselves. Thoughts?

-1

compound eyes are not multi eyes

A compound eye is a grouping of many individual(walled off) units of lenses and rods that together make up a single eye.

What you see are the multiple lenses that make up the surface of a insect eye. Not dozens of individual eyes. Where in mammals all rods are devoted to a single large lens, insect eyes are unitary with each rod having its own tiny lens.

-1, as Ruku said.

Ruku said:
-1

compound eyes are not multi eyes

A compound eye is a grouping of many individual(walled off) units of lenses and rods that together make up a single eye.

What you see are the multiple lenses that make up the surface of a insect eye. Not dozens of individual eyes. Where in mammals all rods are devoted to a single large lens, insect eyes are unitary with each rod having its own tiny lens.

ah i see... huh the more you know i suppose! i was trying to research whether or not they were multiple eyes online, seems i was mistaken. thanks!