Implicating human → humanoid
Link to implication

Reason:

Cuts down on blacklist size. Some people may wish to avoid any non-furry characters in their images, and not_furry only cuts out the ones purely with them.

Conversely, in tag-positive searches, some users may want to see images of any non-furry with an is-furry character, and the only tags we have specifically for those is the ones relating to sex.

no??

Ledian said:
no??

Reason?

This might not be completely infeasible anymore, because of the recent addition of tags such as human_focus. Implicating human to humanoid would simplify the tag group a lot, though other tags like human_on_humanoid would then become problematic.

Still, I'd prefer to keep them separate. Since the important distinction between human and humanoid is that the latter is site-relevant.

If we want to reduce blacklist/search complexity regarding humans and humanoids jointly, I believe the solution is to add an umbrella tag like non-furry_pictured. Redefining human and humanoid would only complicate things further.

This is otherwise an issue of increasing the sizes of blacklists and tag searches.

Though this brought up a valid point, I'm gonna have to deny the implication.

-1

Humanoid is effectively the same thing as anthropomorphic - like a human but not human - except that it specifically stresses physiological similarity where anthropomorphic (in its loosest sense) can be any human trait whatsoever such as a dancing teacup.