The intent of this forum thread is to review past aliases or implications to see if they should still occur, or if they should be removed for a given reason.

Particularly, this would be useful when bulk tags are suggested, and/or when new tags (inheriting or otherwise) are involved. Instead of several old forum threads revived, a person could use this thread to ask for alias/implication reviews.

To bring to topic:

Oh hey did not notice you made a thread specifically for this. Gathering all of these together may help bring more attention, but if something gets into more debate it may warrant its own thread.

forum #232391:

Mistaken implication, should be an alias instead.
wicke_(pokemon) → wicke_(pokémon) forum #207492

Siral_Exan said:
Create tags for intersex young children. This would involve more effort, but gives precision.

And how would you go about telling the difference between a young feminine male and a young dickgirl? Or a young masculine female and a young cuntboy?

BlueDingo said:
And how would you go about telling the difference between a young feminine male and a young dickgirl? Or a young masculine female and a young cuntboy?

You think I was kidding when I said it'd require more effort? 🎵One of these things, isn't like the others!

But we're talking shit like the obvious, oppai lolis or overtly masculine shotas, just with their dangly parts / lack thereof changed around. It is quite hard to tell if otherwise.

Siral_Exan said:
You think I was kidding when I said it'd require more effort? One of these things, isn't like the others!

But we're talking shit like the obvious, oppai lolis or overtly masculine shotas, just with their dangly parts / lack thereof changed around. It is quite hard to tell if otherwise.

At that point I'd wonder more if they aren't just midgets.

Furrin_Gok said:
At that point I'd wonder more if they aren't just midgets.

There are subtle differences, but at this point we are delving far too deep into biology and fantasy to logically make an argument that's anything but ridiculous.

brick_wall -> invalid_tag (forum #200433)
wall -> invalid_tag (forum #200433)

Brick_wall should still be usable, people have been using brick instead anyway. Wall probably ought to be disambiguated.

JAKXXX3 said:
brick_wall -> invalid_tag (forum #200433)
wall -> invalid_tag (forum #200433)

Brick_wall should still be usable, people have been using brick instead anyway. Wall probably ought to be disambiguated.

+1
brick_wall is really distinguishable feature on image and can be featured in several seperate occasions, which can be inside, outside or neither.

wall in itself sounds pointless, but it does make sense to disambig it instead of invalidating as some users may mean something like inside, wall with window or even high solid fence.

Mario69 said:
+1
brick_wall is really distinguishable feature on image and can be featured in several seperate occasions, which can be inside, outside or neither.

wall in itself sounds pointless, but it does make sense to disambig it instead of invalidating as some users may mean something like inside, wall with window or even high solid fence.

Or the Pink Floyd album "The Wall".

I've been using brickwall to get around the brick wall invalidation because I didn't feel like creating yet another set.

Unimplicate preteen from young. It's already aliased to child, and tags that have been aliased away should not have implications.

Also unalias slime_girl, googirl, gooboy, and slime_monster from goo. Those need to be aliased to the goo_creature instead. Already nagged about this in forum #231059, but the sooner it is done, the better. Those old aliases are getting in the way of clean up, because some still use them.

I'd rather each suggestion get its own thread.

Discussion of each topic would be contained to one place, and sourcing would be much easier.

I'll try to look at everything already posted in here. New discussion threads will be posted as I get to them.