Implicating white_paws → paws_white_fur
Link to implication

Reason:

I can't think if a not-obvious way to explain this, other than this isn't already implied.

uh.. what. paws_white_fur is not exactly a valid tag.

and if you meant to implying to paws and white_fur, the paws would work but not the white fur. its not only furred characters that can have paws, also fur tags applies only to characters that have clearly visible fur.

-1

-empty tag
-too specific
-improper spelling format
-white_paws is not specific as to what the body texture is.

How about manual retagging with white_fur and socks_(marking)?

half-approved.

Implicating white_paws -> paws is the most I will do.

EDIT: second thought, disambiguating. There's a character named whitepaws, surprise surprise.