As it stand only grey_countershading implicates countershading. We also need the following implications:

• reverse_countershading -> countershading
• white_countershading -> countershading
• blue_countershading -> countershading
• yellow_countershading -> countershading
• green_countershading -> countershading
• pink_countershading -> countershading
• red_countershading -> countershading
• brown_countershading -> countershading
• teal_countershading -> countershading
• purple_countershading -> countershading
• black_countershading -> countershading
• cyan_countershading -> countershading (alias to teal_countershading?)
• tan_countershading -> countershading

Having a separate tag for each of these seems like overkill. It would probably be good enough to just tag countershading color1_fur color2_fur.

My vote is to alias them all to countershading – including reverse_countershading.

rezi said:
As it stand only grey_countershading implicates countershading. We also need the following implications:

Sounds good, though I'm not sure about tan & teal atm

-
(Was planning to bring up some kind of colour standardization forum thing in the past, and there was similar talk in at least 1 place [forum #204404, forum #204414],
but the former is incomplete, and nothing came of the latter afaik)

Update, approved almost all implications for *countershading. I will check for more tags soon.

Tan and cream can probably be consolidated. If and when they are, I'll take care of the implication removals.

Knotty_Curls said:
Update, approved almost all implications for *countershading. I will check for more tags soon.

Tan and cream can probably be consolidated. If and when they are, I'll take care of the implication removals.

Great. There also are:

• forum #215743 (countershade_torso).
• forum #215744 (countershade_face).

What about the <color>_belly tags, such as white_belly? Those were originally created for the exact same usage, because 'countershading' was deemed to be too obscure of a word to use as a tag.

But now we have both. That should probably be sorted out someday.