Implicating crossed_legs → legs_together
Link to implication

Reason:

Crossed legs are legs touching each other, aka... legs together.

EDIT: The tag implication crossed_legs -> legs_together (forum #238200) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Doesn't seem to fit posts such as:
post #529674 post #397665 post #1216869 post #1169595

-1. Legs_together images usually don't have crossed_legs.

post #811761post #1145610

Genjar said:
Doesn't seem to fit posts such as:
post #529674 post #397665 post #1216869 post #1169595

All the legs in those images are touching each other, (second image is arguably leg touching thigh but is pretty close) is that not what legs together is? Perhaps the wiki for this tag should be updated to address this confusion and make the definition of this tag more specific.

BlueDingo said:
-1. Legs_together images usually don't have crossed_legs.

post #811761post #1145610

Unless i'm mistaken, that would be the other way around; i'm suggesting that crossed legs IMPLIES legs together, therefore NOT all legs together are crossed.

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
All the legs in those images are touching each other, (second image is arguably leg touching thigh but is pretty close) is that not what legs together is? Perhaps the wiki for this tag should be updated to address this confusion and make the definition of this tag more specific.

As it's being used now, legs_together is the opposite of open_legs and closed_legs is aliased to it. It doesn't simply mean both legs are touching each other. A more accurate definition for it is when a character pressed their knees and/or thighs together.

This would also explain why we don't have an arms_together tag yet despite having plenty of images with arms touching each other.

BlueDingo said:
As it's being used now, legs_together is the opposite of open_legs and closed_legs is aliased to it. It doesn't simply mean both legs are touching each other. A more accurate definition for it is when a character pressed their knees and/or thighs together.

This would also explain why we don't have an arms_together tag yet despite having plenty of images with arms touching each other.

Ahhhhh I see I see, gotcha. I feel someone should possibly update the wiki page explaining this to avoid further confusion such as the one I made.

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Ahhhhh I see I see, gotcha. I feel someone should possibly update the wiki page explaining this to avoid further confusion such as the one I made.

Done.

The tag implication crossed_legs -> legs_together (forum #238200) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.