Implicating mega_manectric → mega_evolution
Link to implication
Reason:
Most other mega Pokémon automatically imply this tag, except Mega Manectric for some reason.
Updated by O16
Topic: Tag Implication: mega_manectric -> mega_evolution
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Huh, odd that that's the only one out. And speaking of Megas, I hope we eventually get more in future Pokemon titles, its a neat concept.
Just hope that future Megas, if they happen, are of Pokemon that AREN'T already super-popular/powerful, current Megas just increase the disparity.
Updated by anonymous
Azula_Arktandr said:
Just hope that future Megas, if they happen, are of Pokemon that AREN'T already super-popular/powerful, current Megas just increase the disparity.
Mega Shuckle, because 250 base DEF is not high enough.
Updated by anonymous
BlueDingo said:
Mega Shuckle, because 250 base DEF is not high enough.
At that point, you're literally just fighting the shell.
Updated by anonymous
Azula_Arktandr said:
Huh, odd that that's the only one out. And speaking of Megas, I hope we eventually get more in future Pokemon titles, its a neat concept.
o_O i just don't understand pokemon fans... evolution has always been in the pokemon franchise. mega evolution is pretty much just a branching point in pokemon evolution.
whatever...i gave up on that rinse & repeat franchise years ago.
Updated by anonymous
+1. Seems appropriate.
Azula_Arktandr said:
Just hope that future Megas, if they happen, are of Pokemon that AREN'T already super-popular/powerful, current Megas just increase the disparity.
Agreed. I would like to see a mega wormadam or perhaps a mega cofagrigus.
-/-/-/-
Two tiny little questions: why do we have a 'mega_raichu' tag and why is it implicated to 'mega_evolution'?
Updated by anonymous
O16 said:
Two tiny little questions: why do we have a 'mega_raichu' tag and why is it implicated to 'mega_evolution'?
Tag implications list says forum #154877.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
Tag implications list says forum #154877.
That implication in particular needs to be removed, there isn't mega raichu (at least no official one), it apparently is a fanmade species.
I noticed that some other mega evolutions also are missing the proper implication, hence I would suggest the following:
Updated by anonymous