Implicating parallel_sex → group_sex
Link to implication

Reason:

Since the tag parallel_sex requires 4 or more participants engaged in sexual activities, I request parallel sex to imply group sex due to group sex needing more than 2 participants.

Here are a few examples:
https://e621.net/post/show/1239717
https://e621.net/post/show/1233310
https://e621.net/post/show/1260329
https://e621.net/post/show/881424
https://e621.net/post/show/1185357
https://e621.net/post/show/1181277
https://e621.net/post/show/1172659

EDIT: The tag implication parallel_sex -> group_sex (forum #238325) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

-1. From my understanding, group_sex involves three or more characters directly interacting in a sexual manner. Two or more pairs of people independently having sex while the tops hold a conversation, bump fists, or anything; wouldn't count as that.

Azula_Arktandr said:
-1. From my understanding, group_sex involves three or more characters directly interacting in a sexual manner. Two or more pairs of people independently having sex while the tops hold a conversation, bump fists, or anything; wouldn't count as that.

group_sex "wiki": Images or animations depicting more than two characters engaging in sexual activities simultaneously. The "group sex" tag specifically refers to groups of people all having sex in the same place, but not necessarily all together.

I only made this request based off of what is said in the actual tag itself. Not disputing your -1 just clarifying.

The tag implication parallel_sex -> group_sex (forum #238325) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.