Implicating puss_in_boots → the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots
Link to implication

Reason:

EDIT: The tag implication puss_in_boots -> the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots (forum #238872) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

-1, he appears in the main line of Shrek movies. This is not implicitly accurate.

-1. Puss in boots is a character from a fairytale, the character in question is a DreamWorks' reinterpretation, in such a way it should have its own tag, something like 'puss_in_boots_(dreamworks)' or similar.
Also what Azula Arktandr mentioned.

I suggest the following implications:

• puss_in_boots_(dreamworks) → dreamwotks.
• puss_in_boots_(dreamworks) → puss_in_boots.¹

¹ It is a version of the character.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puss_in_Boots

why people so often forget that majority fairy tale movies are in fact based on old fairy tales and the characters are not exclusive to these movies because they have been in books and stories for decades or even centuries before the movies..........

lhorse said:
Implicating puss_in_boots → the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots
Link to implication

Reason:

I was wrong I meant puss_in_boots → the_master_cat

lhorse said:
I was wrong I meant puss_in_boots → the_master_cat

that... its not good implication either.... the_master_cat is just portion of original italian title for puss_in_boots. puss_in_boots_(copyright) would be better but still extremely useless because it would contain exact same posts as puss_in_boots

The tag implication puss_in_boots -> the_adventures_of_puss_in_boots (forum #238872) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.