Implicating chaps → clothing
Link to implication

Reason:

chaps are a type of clothing.

Related aliases:

• crotchless_chaps → chaps.¹
• crotchless_pants → chaps.²

Partially related alias:

• crotchless → crotchless_(disambiguation).³

¹ Chaps already are crotchless.

² Apparently people tend to use this tag when they don't know what is the actual name of the garment in question.

³ It since may refer to 'chaps', 'crotchless_panties or any clothes that expose the crotch area (I don't know if we have a tag for those).

Note: The main suggestion already was suggested in the middle of a forum discussion ≥ 2 years ago, however have been lost in our limbo since then.

EDIT: The tag implication chaps -> clothing (forum #238606) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

+1 to all except "crotchless_pants" aliased to "chaps" because a fair portion of the crotchless_pants tag is filled with crotchless pants that aren't chaps.

BrokenClock said:
+1 to all except "crotchless_pants" aliased to "chaps" because a fair portion of the crotchless_pants tag is filled with crotchless pants that aren't chaps.

Maybe you are right. I will fix the posts that are actual chaps then, yet I am not sure about what to do with the other posts or the tag itself.

The tag implication chaps -> clothing (forum #238606) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.