Because it is all subjective and biased, THAT'S why.
There are no stated standards anywhere on this website; I've looked. That means moderators--creatures no one has ever seen in the flesh and knows nothing about--have TOTAL power over whose art is seen or not seen.
That is BS, pure and simple.
I've seen black and white outlined doodles, which probably took all of 5 seconds to drool out on a napkin, that are approved on this website.
I've seen graphic depictions of brutal, bloody mutilations and oral defecations of characters that are approved on this site.
I've seen stupid, pointless posts with NEGATIVE VOTING SCORES approved on this site.
And yet my modest comic art that had color and form and substance WITH POSITIVE UPVOTES AND FAVS FROM USERS doesn't meet their "minimum quality standards"?
ONE OF MY POSTS WAS REMOVED AND THE ONLY "REASON" GIVEN WAS "NO."
These so-called "moderators" don't even know anything about art! I once posted a drawing with DELIBERATE HAZE on the image to give it a dreamy quality, and a moderator removed it because they thought I did it by mistake. That alone proves these moderators don't know their asses from HOLES IN THE GROUND!
My point is, what gives them the right to decide whose stuff gets posted and whose doesn't when they know nothing about art, have no accreditation, and contradict themselves on their own "standards"?
Shout out to Notmenotyou, Thehuskyk9, and Ratte for being particularly heinous offenders of this hypocrisy.
Updated by Ratte