For one thing, they don't have any accreditation. What says they know more about what makes good art than anyone else? What art degrees do they have? Nothing and none. They can't even tell when edits are deliberately made to a post for an artistic effect!
For another thing, "minimum quality standards" don't exist anywhere on this site--none that I have found anyway. That means all their approvals are chosen subjectively and with large amounts of bias.
For a third thing, they are *&^holes.
For a fourth thing, they give BS reasons for deletion of posts. Ratte (cute handle, by the way 9.9) removed my most recent post after only being up for a day, and his only reason was "no." How insightful. Even Trump has a larger vocabulary than that.
My logic leaves no room for refutation.
I don't read/respond to replies because I am only interested in sharing my wisdom, not hearing flamer backtalk from children.
Notmenotyou and Thekuskyk9 can suck one off, too.
Updated by Ratte