Implicating ring → jewelry
Link to implication

Reason:

Rings are a type of jewelry. I am suspicious that there was some discussion about this, but I couldn't find anything

EDIT: The tag implication ring -> jewelry (forum #203350) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

forum #182501 is seriously the only thing that involves ring to jewelry, but it wasn't implicated fully as Furrin had suggested.

Siral_Eurgh-xan said:
forum #182501 is seriously the only thing that involves ring to jewelry, but it wasn't implicated fully as Furrin had suggested.

Yeah, I saw that one. From the sound of it it seems they already thought ring to jewelry was already a thing, which just added to my surprise that it's not

rezi said:
Yeah, I saw that one. From the sound of it it seems they already thought ring to jewelry was already a thing, which just add to my surprise that it's not

Well, you have my +1. I feel like a lot of images that may have jewelry, accessories, and etc. are not tagged with them.

+1 I see nothing particularly wrong with rings being labeled as jewelry.

Other potential candidates:

• tail_jewelry
• tail_ring
• (tail_band)
• pendant
• brooch
• crown
• tiara
• armlet

I'm hesitant about approving this one. By the definition of the Wiki, it's jewely, but a ring can be any tiny, circular object, like in machines, armor, small chains, etc.

Hudson said:
I'm hesitant about approving this one. By the definition of the Wiki, it's jewely, but a ring can be any tiny, circular object, like in machines, armor, small chains, etc.

Should we disambiguate ring as well then? (I'm a fan of disambiguations). Or is it just too much work for too little pay?

I don't think rings are jewelry. If it is made of a valuable element however...
Rings can be made of a cheap material thus not necessary something valuable.
How about ring -> ornament?

Sorrowless said:
I don't think rings are jewelry. If it is made of a valuable element however...
Rings can be made of a cheap material thus not necessary something valuable.
How about ring -> ornament?

Jewelry in itself doesn't have to be valuable in itself. Much jewelry you can buy today is pretty much worthless trinkets if not seen as jewelry. While others are simply given value due to the work put into making them.

A jewelry or ornament implication (or similar) apparently won't work for reasons @Hudson mentioned.

Bump, propose disambiguate ring to ring_(disambiguation) to get rid of "other" types of rings.

For the one considered jewelry, use digit_ring instead. Then implicate it with jewelry.

Discussion Thread, forum #238502

The tag implication ring -> jewelry (forum #203350) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.