Implicating raccoon_penis → hooked_penis
Link to implication

Reason:

Raccoon penises have a hook at the end. Unlike a knot or a flared_penis it's a skeletal feature that is present with or without erection so if it's visible (and accurately drawn) enough to identify as a raccoon penis, it's visible enough to have a hook.

EDIT: The tag implication raccoon_penis -> hooked_penis (forum #243511) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

-1

a dick that can be identified as raccoon penis is not always necessarily visibly hooked because of image angles, things obstructing the view etc

post #1305402

Should we even name this kind of thing after racoons specifically? Are there other forms of hooked penises?

Furrin_Gok said:
Should we even name this kind of thing after racoons specifically? Are there other forms of hooked penises?

Quite a few mustelids (though not all) have hooked penises to some degree. Looking at the baculum, it appears some rodents do as well. Personally I've experimented with putting hooks in fantasy animal penises, so that's another possible place for a hook to turn up.

Ledian said:
-1

a dick that can be identified as raccoon penis is not always necessarily visibly hooked because of image angles, things obstructing the view etc

Even there the head is at a visible different angle than the shaft. In most cases where it would be obstructed, other identifying features would be obstructed, like here:

post #826515

You can't tell if it's supposed to be a realistic raccoon penis from such angles.

Admittedly though there's a problem with raccoon penises that are inaccurately drawn, likely due to lack of reference and guessing.

regsmutt said:
Quite a few mustelids (though not all) have hooked penises to some degree. Looking at the baculum, it appears some rodents do as well. Personally I've experimented with putting hooks in fantasy animal penises, so that's another possible place for a hook to turn up.

Even there the head is at a visible different angle than the shaft. In most cases where it would be obstructed, other identifying features would be obstructed, like here:

post #826515

You can't tell if it's supposed to be a realistic raccoon penis from such angles.

Admittedly though there's a problem with raccoon penises that are inaccurately drawn, likely due to lack of reference and guessing.

What I'm saying is that naming it "Racoon Penis" will make people tag it for any raccoon with a dick. How does it differ between different mustelids?

Furrin_Gok said:
What I'm saying is that naming it "Racoon Penis" will make people tag it for any raccoon with a dick. How does it differ between different mustelids?

That shouldn't apply more than canine_penis is applied to any canine with a penis. In any case, I didn't create or name the raccoon_penis tag, just suggesting that because being hooked is an identifying feature of raccoon penises, maybe raccoon penis should imply hooked penis.

Raccoons are not mustelids, not all mustelid penises have a hook. There aren't any universal defining features of mustelid penises the way there are for canine, equine, or feline penises. Imo the group is so diverse and so few quality references exist that mustelid_penis should be invalidated. Google 'mustelid baculum' and you'll see how they differ.

The tag implication raccoon_penis -> hooked_penis (forum #243511) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.