Topic: Tag Implication: voluptuous -> big_breasts

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Yeah, you gotta suggest one, and then edit it to suggest a related one. Both fields only support one singular tag.

Updated by anonymous

-1, plz no. Tags are not always tagged according to the wiki. Implications like this make tagging mistakes almost unfixable.

Think of some user tagging voluptuous on an image without wide_hips. And another user trying to remove clearly incorrect wide_hips tag. It may not even be a mistake, like say for a bust portrait that doesn't show hips.

Updated by anonymous

Vapor.exe said:
Implicating voluptuous → big_breasts

The wiki entry for big_breasts states "Breasts that are above average in size, but no bigger than the character's head." So there is an upper limit on big_breasts, but surely a character with breasts bigger than their head could still easily be considered voluptuous.

Or do yall even follow that rule considering this post #1359520 was the top result...

Updated by anonymous

Dyrone said:
The wiki entry for big_breasts states "Breasts that are above average in size, but no bigger than the character's head." So there is an upper limit on big_breasts, but surely a character with breasts bigger than their head could still easily be considered voluptuous.

Or do yall even follow that rule considering this post #1359520 was the top result...

That shouldn't be a problem since the implications are nested.

Hyper_breasts implies huge_breasts.
Huge_breasts implies big_breasts.

WRT the definition of voluptuous in consideration of these implications, I generally agree that the larger sizes could also fit the definition.

Although beyond a certain size it's more doubtful:
post #1359249

Updated by anonymous

  • 1