Implicating consentacles → sex
Link to implication

Reason:

Tag implies there is sex. It's even aliased to consensual_tentacle_*sex*

Implicating horn_sex → sex
Link to implication

Reason:

It's right on the tin.

EDIT: The tag implication consentacles -> sex (forum #261181) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

-1, have it imply tentacle_sex instead.

Also I'm not sure what the general stance would be regarding considering sex with tentacles actual site standard "sex"; tentacles aren't considered characters whatsoever for tagging purposes, unless they're distinctively connected to an active character in context. So would it imply the normal sex tag to begin with, when the sex tag applies only when two or more active characters participate in a sexual act? I'm unsure as to how that would fit.

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
-1, have it imply tentacle_sex instead.

There are also consentacles posts that do not feature penetration and thus fail to qualify for tentacle_sex

"Those aren't tentacles... They're genticles!"

MagnusEffect said:
There are also consentacles posts that do not feature penetration and thus fail to qualify for tentacle_sex

Fair enough!

Edit: Not all sex has to be penetration, actually. See: cunnilingus, ball_lick, penis_lick, etc.

Regardless, yeah, not all consentacles is tentacle_sex (such as caressing, hugs, etc)

The tag implication consentacles -> sex (forum #261181) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.