Implicating urethral_oviposition → urethra
Link to implication
Reason:
Implied by the name of the tag itself.
EDIT: The tag implication urethral_oviposition -> urethra (forum #261279) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating urethral_oviposition → urethra
Link to implication
Implied by the name of the tag itself.
EDIT: The tag implication urethral_oviposition -> urethra (forum #261279) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
Updated by auto moderator
The tag already implies Urethra.
Nevermind. You edited it in to say it was implicated when it wasn't. You also linked the "implied" tags to the search page, those tags should go to their wiki pages... but those processes are automatic, you don't need to edit in anything. Once an alias/implication is approved, the page will be updated accordingly.
Updated by anonymous
-1 its possible to depict that there is eggs coming out of urethra without the actual urethra being visible
Updated by anonymous
Should implicate urethral instead. Also, oviposition.
Updated by anonymous
siikaprinssi said:
-1 its possible to depict that there is eggs coming out of urethra without the actual urethra being visible
assuming you mean the urethra in regard to females, while it may be posible for eggs to come out of the urethra, it would be too ambiguous(it could be the vagina or urethra ,cannot conclude if not visible) to tag, as such females would default to generic oviposition and never have ether of these urethra tags to began with.
Males would get both these tags by default sence the penis only has a urethra, there is no question as to were the eggs come out of.
Updated by anonymous
animperfectpatsy said:
Should implicate urethral instead. Also, oviposition.
that wiki has no information on what it should be used for but urethral/sounding is the perpiceful insertion of objects from outside into the penis or female urethra, not the expulsion of objects from within the body
Updated by anonymous
Darou said:
assuming you mean the urethra in regard to females, while it may be posible for eggs to come out of the urethra, it would be too ambiguous(it could be the vagina or urethra ,cannot conclude if not visible) to tag, as such females would default to generic oviposition and never have ether of these urethra tags to began with.
Males would get both these tags by default sence the penis only has a urethra, there is no question as to were the eggs come out of.
i meant what i say. if a male character is depicted from behind, its very possible to see that theres stuff coming from the dick without the urethra being visible. urethra cannot be tagged if its not visible.
Updated by anonymous
The tag implication urethral_oviposition -> urethra (forum #261279) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.