Implicating breast_shot → breasts
Link to implication

Reason:

Need Breasts to have a breast_shot

EDIT: The tag implication breast_shot -> breasts (forum #252180) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Also add

Implications

foot_shot -> close-up
eye_shot -> close-up
butt_shot -> butt
crotch_shot -> close-up
mouth_shot -> close-up

-1 for the mouth_shot -> close-up
its not necessarily a close-up, theres plenty of headshot portraits in the mouth shot tag. in wiki headshot pirtraits are explicitly ruled as something that does not overlap with close-up

Commander_Eggplant said:
-1 for the mouth_shot -> close-up
its not necessarily a close-up, theres plenty of headshot portraits in the mouth shot tag. in wiki headshot pirtraits are explicitly ruled as something that does not overlap with close-up

I never suggested a implication of headshot_portrait to close-up :?

I've only corrected the wiki for mouth_shot today, sence it was essentially being described as a image set of vore themed headshot portraits rather then close ups of the mouth as it should be... if someone wants to find vote themed headshots then they should use sets not tags. Headshot_portraits should have never been tagged to mouth_shot to begin with unless they realy were close ups of the mouth. which is the definition of all "bodypart"_shot tags, close up and focus of the described bodypart alone. I didn't start that definition. All of the wiki's or usage already applied that definition before I edited any of them except for mouth shot.

If you disagree then mouth_shot must be aliased to headshot_portrait as it's prior wiki description made both esentually one and a same.

Darou said:
I never suggested a implication of headshot_portrait to close-up :?

I've only corrected the wiki for mouth_shot today, sence it was essentially being described as a image set of vore themed headshot portraits rather then close ups of the mouth as it should be... if someone wants to find vote themed headshots then they should use sets not tags. Headshot_portraits should have never been tagged to mouth_shot to begin with unless they realy were close ups of the mouth. which is the definition of all "bodypart"_shot tags, close up and focus of the described bodypart alone. I didn't start that definition. All of the wiki's or usage already applied that definition before I edited any of them except for mouth shot.

If you disagree then mouth_shot must be aliased to headshot_portrait as it's prior wiki description made both esentually one and a same.

what.. reading comprehension my guy? i said i was against implying mouth shot to close-up. this is because huge chunk of the mouth shot tags content are in fact headshot portraits.

also uhhhhh... i think that you really should not be suddenly changing the tag's wiki like that without any discussion about what belongs into the tag and what does not. because you essentially just decided all by yourself that half of the tag's content doesnt belong there anymore. also in the wiki you are telling people to use headshot tag, which is for images where characters are literally getting bullet in their head.

The wiki edit is consistent with the group, though.
"Only X visible, everything else cropped out". If the whole head is visible, then it does become head_shot instead of mouth_shot.

Admittedly mouth_shot is problematic because it used to be maw_shot, and used to be closely connected to vore. I think we need some tag for the vore-related ones, but mouth_shot is not the best fit for those.

Mouth_focus would be more consistent for the "trying to eat the viewer"-type of posts. (Compare to foot_focus, butt_focus, etc.)

The tag implication breast_shot -> breasts (forum #252180) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.