Implicating fallen → eliksni
Link to implication

Implicating the_fallen → eliksni
Link to implication

Implicating Eliksni → Destiny
Link to implication

Implicating Destiny_2 → Destiny
Link to implication

Implicating destiny_(video_game) → Destiny
Link to implication

Reason:

The fallen (from Destiny) have an actual species name and that is Eliksni.

Although Fallen or The Fallen is the most used name for them and Eliksni is rarely mentioned, it's still their specieis similar to how Sangheili is the species for Elites from halo.

These could be reversed however, but i'll leave it up to the admin that approves this what name should be used up front.

EDIT: The tag implication fallen -> eliksni (forum #261917) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Also the Destiny tag is honestly kinda bad too, its all some weird female cat character, ill be fixing that

Scakk said:
Also the Destiny tag is honestly kinda bad too, its all some weird female cat character, ill be fixing that

Then it needs a disambiguation, don't go changing/removing tags from posts to fit the copyright. The copyright should be changed to destiny_(copyright) or destiny_(game), and any alias/implication should lead to there. There might be other games, so it may need a suffix befitting the company (which I don't remember ATM).

Also, some of what you suggested should be aliased. If it is a species tag, then we don't need two species tags for a specific entity. Whether it is (the) Fallen or Eliksni, one of those should only exist.

Siral_Exan said:
Then it needs a disambiguation, don't to changing/removing to fit the copyright. The copyright should be changed to destiny_(copyright) or destiny_(game), and any alias/implication should lead to there. There might be other games, so it may need a suffix befitting the company (which I don't remember ATM).

im replacing the art with destiny_(character) because I guess the artist decided to make the name of their character a Copyright tag.
The copyright Destiny tag will remain as it is i assume,

I dont think it needs (video_game) because a character named Destiny is a character.

maybe Destiny_(Series)? since there are 2 games so far.

Scakk said:
im replacing the art with destiny_(character) because I guess the artist decided to make the name of their character a Copyright tag.
The copyright Destiny tag will remain as it is i assume,

I dont think it needs (video_game) because a character named Destiny is a character.

maybe Destiny_(Series)? since there are 2 games so far.

The problem is, using copyright:destiny changed it from a character to a copyright tag. Someone had done that, so all instances of the character were falsely tagged as a copyright. This can occur vice versa, someone can change it back to a character if it's below 150 tags. Since there are likely multiple characters named "Destiny", we will need to make a tag for each one and for Bungie's series.

sounds like something that's likely to be tagged for other things. I'm kinda surprised that it already hasn't been. I can think of at least dozen species named that from various franchises, plus a half-dozen movies. So -1 for that implication.

The one from Destiny should probably all be moved to the_fallen.

The tag implication fallen -> eliksni (forum #261917) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.