Implicating Rainbow_fur → Rainbow
Link to implication

Reason:

I'm pretty sure you can't implicate a colored type of fur to something you see in the sky after it rains with the sun out. :/

Arcaninetales said:
I'm pretty sure you can't implicate a colored type of fur to something you see in the sky after it rains with the sun out. :/

^ That. Rainbow colored something isn't itself a rainbow.

Looks like it needs to be sorted out.
I had assumed that rainbow should only be tagged for actual rainbows. But judging from from the wiki description and how it's currently used... it looks more like a color tag.

But if so, then we don't have any tag for actual rainbows. :/

Genjar said:
Looks like it needs to be sorted out.
I had assumed that rainbow should only be tagged for actual rainbows. But judging from from the wiki description and how it's currently used... it looks more like a color tag.

But if so, then we don't have any tag for actual rainbows. :/

I've been thinking for awhile that a tag like rainbow_(symbol) could be created to differentiate the actual rainbow symbols either arching across the sky or drawn on hoodies, tattoos, cutie_marks etc. And then have it implicate rainbow, because it'd still have the rainbow colors, just in a very distinctive shape, while rainbow stays for the color pattern no matter what shape it comes in. But that project is so far down my list of tag messes to sort out that I haven't done anything on it yet. So that's just a possible solution.