Implicating milk_inflation → milk
Link to implication

Reason:

It involves milk.

EDIT: The tag implication milk_inflation -> milk (forum #262160) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

JamesPawson said:
Implicating milk_inflation → milk
Link to implication

Reason:

It involves milk.

What about an image of one character clearly inflated from sucking on another character's breasts, but where no milk is shown? It's clearly milk_inflation, but the milk tag is not appropriate.

i could say that is just inflation, as such if not shown, but if you literally can see [falling into the "Tag what you see" Class of course] then it should be those both if not just milk tags on it.

in other words, what you know about the image is only taggable if you can see each thing on the image itself

Clawdragons said:
What about an image of one character clearly inflated from sucking on another character's breasts, but where no milk is shown? It's clearly milk_inflation, but the milk tag is not appropriate.

if there is no visible milk, it shouldnt be tagged as milk inflation since there is no actual proof of character being inflated with milk. cum inflation is handled same way

The tag implication milk_inflation -> milk (forum #262160) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.