Aliasing embarrassed_nude_female → embarrassed
Link to alias

Reason:

We don't support compound tags like happy_clothed_fox.

Also alias
enf -> embarrassed

Why did they make an abbreviation? I don't know.

EDIT: The tag alias embarrassed_nude_female -> embarrassed (forum #236623) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

I understand the logic behind aliasing it, but "enf" is definitely a fetish, specifically because it features an embarrassed nude female, hence why it's being tagged. I'm not sure it that helps, but at the very least, I can image there are people who'd want to search for it.

Strikerman said:
I understand the logic behind aliasing it, but "enf" is definitely a fetish, specifically because it features an embarrassed nude female, hence why it's being tagged. I'm not sure it that helps, but at the very least, I can image there are people who'd want to search for it.

There are fetishes for literally anything, and anyone can search for whatever they please. But, since this is overtly specific on both regards, it is effectively worthless to keep; using the three words in a tag search works just as well.

Also, there are so many redundant tags in the first post, the actual searchability of the post is hampered. That serves as an example for the rest of those tags, more aliases should be in place to prevent that.

theres no need to have separate specific tag for every single humiliation fetishist's preferences

+1
Belongs in sets, or just search embarrassed nude female.

Bump for +1. Just saw this on a few posts and was wondering why it existed. And yes, it should alias to embarassed, not to female, because it's easier to notice a missing gender tag than a missing embarassed tag. Nude is less easily noticed than female, but moreso than embarassed.

+1 I was just about to bump this thread too.

Furrin_Gok said:
Nude is less easily noticed than female, but moreso than embarassed.

Not to mention the fact that the tag is on characters who are mostly_nude and not `nude`. (also one that's not male and not female)

darryus said:
+1 I was just about to bump this thread too.

Not to mention the fact that the tag is on characters who are mostly_nude and not `nude`. (also one that's not male and not female)

Which post would that be? I suspect it got removed recently.
Also, sometimes posts like post #1506799 get tagged, which don't seem to be embarassed.

Furrin_Gok said:
Which post would that be? I suspect it got removed recently.

You should know which post I'm talking about you removed the tag from it

Also, sometimes posts like post #1506799 get tagged, which don't seem to be embarassed.

Yeah, this whole tag is a bit of a mess.

darryus said:
You should know which post I'm talking about you removed the tag from it]
You said there was one that was not male at the same time as not being female. That image is clearly male.

Furrin_Gok said:
You said there was one that was not male at the same time as not being female. That image is clearly male.

oh that was a typo, i'm dumb

The tag alias embarrassed_nude_female -> embarrassed (forum #236623) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Does this mean embarrassed_nude_male (239 posts) is going away too?

The bulk update request #3346 is active.

create alias embarrassed_nude_anthro (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarrassed_nude_male (0) -> embarrassed (50085)

Reason: embarrassed_nude_female aliased to embarrassed.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3346 (forum #346083) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Meh. The alternative to using embarrassed_nude_male would be searching something like embarrassed nude male -breasts -pussy -sex -masturbation, which is a bit lengthy. -breasts -pussy rules out a female/intersex character being the nude one, and -sex -masturbation rules out being embarrassed about being caught in a sex act rather than simply about being naked. It's a bit of a lengthy search, but I suppose it's more-or-less equivalent to the tag.

The bulk update request #5415 is active.

create alias embarrased_nude_female (0) -> embarrassed (50085)

Reason: Misspelling of embarrassed_nude_female, which has already been aliased.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5415 (forum #374702) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #5415 (forum #374702) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #3346 (forum #346083) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #7192 is active.

create alias embarassed_nude_female (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarased_nude_female (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarassed_nude_male (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarrased_nude_male (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarassed_nude_anthro (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarrassed_nude_andromorph (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarrassed_nude_gynomorph (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarrassed_nude_herm (0) -> embarrassed (50085)
create alias embarrassed_nude_maleherm (0) -> embarrassed (50085)

Reason: misspellings & futureproofing

All of these (minus maleherm) have been used at least once

EDIT: The bulk update request #7192 (forum #396759) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #7192 (forum #396759) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.