Topic: Tag Implication: public_humiliation -> humiliation

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

CrocoGator

Member

Implicating public_humiliation → humiliation
Link to implication

Reason:

public_humiliation is a type of humiliation.

(This is one of those situations where I'm not sure if it's better to suggest an implication or just fix the tags...)

EDIT: The tag implication public_humiliation -> humiliation (forum #256729) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Updated by auto moderator

CrocoGator

Member

(This is one of those situations where I'm not sure if it's better to suggest an implication or just fix the tags...)

For the record, I'm not even sure what past me meant by this.

Furrin Gok

Member

crocogator said:
For the record, I'm not even sure what past me meant by this.

"Just fix the tags" sounds like you thought an implication was an alias, and thought of replacing them all.

wat8548

Member

I'm on the fence about this one. Can anyone produce an example of a scenario in which someone is being humiliated and it is in public, but it is not "public humiliation"? It seems like this might be just as well served by two separate tags.

SNPtheCat

Member

wat8548 said:
I'm on the fence about this one. Can anyone produce an example of a scenario in which someone is being humiliated and it is in public, but it is not "public humiliation"? It seems like this might be just as well served by two separate tags.

This may be a stretch but...

public wiki

This is a general tag used for posts depicting a public setting; a location open to random people in general, or an otherwise populated area.

It could be humiliation in a public setting, but without any people around. If people aren't necessary for public humiliation then yeah, it's just a combination of public + humiliation

However, if you're talking about how both tags could be on a post without public humiliation, then it could be a comic in which one panel shows a public place, and another shows humiliation in private

  • 1