Implicating gaping_mouth → open_mouth
Link to implication
Reason:
If a mouth is gaping, doesn't that just mean it's *really* open? Seems kind of obvious.
Updated by engageforth
Topic: Tag Implication: gaping_mouth -> open_mouth
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
+1. It is logical and indeed obvious; maybe it is too obvious, that no-one paid real attention to the fact of it being non-implicated, it sounds kind of paradoxical but wouldn't be the first time something like that happens.
Updated by anonymous
+1. I also suggest "mouth shot" to have an implication to open mouth, since those types of images require an open mouth to be of focus.
Updated by anonymous
+1 for speedy approval of the original implication. A gaping mouth is necessarily open, and it would be hard for even the most clueless of taggers to mistag. Current state of untagged open_mouth: gaping_mouth -open_mouth
I also support @DicelovesBeingBlown's implication. That one may require a quick sweep of mouth_shot -open_mouth for the small possibility of people having tagged closed smiles or internal views of a closed mouth (imagine post #1116985 but more closed) as mouth_shot.
Updated by anonymous