Topic: Tag Alias: 'anthro_on_anthro' -> invalid_tag

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

This topic has been locked.

Aliasing 'anthro_on_anthro' → invalid_tag
Link to alias

Reason:

NOTE: I am still having the problem where it won't let me post these without putting the tag in quotes because it claims the tag is already aliased, when the wiki states it is not & it shows up fine when searched for.

This, like anthro and anthrofied is just too obvious to bother tagging.

If you come to e621 & search for sex you're most likely looking for two furries having sex. If you're not, then there are tags you can add or tags you can block in your search to get what you're after.

anthro_on_feral or anthro_on_human or feral_on_are all fine tags, but 'anthro_on_anthro' is as useless as the tags image or skin

Updated by Chaser

If someone wants to search for a specific image, say an orgy involving multiple characters, and remembers that 2 anthros were together, the anthro/anthro tag would serve a useful purpose for them.

-1

Updated by anonymous

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
If someone wants to search for a specific image, say an orgy involving multiple characters, and remembers that 2 anthros were together, the anthro/anthro tag would serve a useful purpose for them.

-1

I don't think that would help at all. It wouldn't do any good if EVERYone in the pile as an anthro, and if you knew what the other members were, there are tags for things like anthro_on_humanoid that would serve the exact purpose you are describing here.

+2

Updated by anonymous

Sparkmane said:
I don't think that would help at all. It wouldn't do any good if EVERYone in the pile as an anthro, and if you knew what the other members were, there are tags for things like anthro_on_humanoid that would serve the exact purpose you are describing here.

+2

...Not if the orgy only involved 1 anthro/anthro couple and the others WEREN'T this. The tag has a use.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1