Implicating portal_sex → portal
Link to implication
Reason:
If portal_sex didn't have a portal, it wouldn't be portal_sex.
Some related ones, that I think probably *can't* be made: portal_panties -> portal and thinking_with_portals -> portal.. eg. there is no clear 'portal' in post #1316081 or post #1906666, even if 'portal stuff' is clearly *happening*. At the moment we have about 22 of 24 posts which have one of the *portal* tags and should also have the general portal tag (but don't).
EDIT: The tag implication portal_sex -> portal (forum #282864) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.
Updated by auto moderator