Aliasing looking_upwards → looking_up
Link to alias

Reason:

looking_upward has previously been used with the same meaning as looking_up at least on post #1953557.

Tag Implication:

• looking_upward -> looking_up
• looking_upwards -> looking_up

EDIT: The tag alias looking_upwards -> looking_up (forum #283397) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

when you have multiple related alias/implications suggestions, you can edit them into the original post you created after doing so, as it saves things getting missed if/when they get dealt with as well as removes clutter from the forums..

A good example of how to format it
https://e621.net/forum/show/281156

Oops. I just submitted some more before reading this, will fix it in a second. Does the system recognize aliases as aliases and implications as implications from the closest header above?

Edit: Actually, I'm not sure I should fix those as I'm not sure the code won't get confused by the repeat aliases/implications or hiding the original posts.

ImageTagger said:
Oops. I just submitted some more before reading this, will fix it in a second. Does the system recognize aliases as aliases and implications as implications from the closest header above?

Edit: Actually, I'm not sure I should fix those as I'm not sure the code won't get confused by the repeat aliases/implications or hiding the original posts.

what's shown in what DDM did is effectively an organized list for the admins, so code isn't really an issue. Though it's kind of late for the existing ones, it's something to consider for future suggestions..

h2.Aliases or h2.Implications to get the larger title text

[[example_text]] to get linked to wiki tags, and -> for the arrow

It's also generally wanted that you give reason for why you suggest an alias or tag to both fuel why you think it's appropriate and give others reason to agree or disagree

I did some experimenting and made a small mess, but it seems the implications listing doesn't get automatically updated with new implications when the posts are edited or hidden. Sorry, admins? If you do have tooling for this, I hope it can handle this just fine. If not, I simplified it all a little for you.

ImageTagger said:
I did some experimenting and made a small mess, but it seems the implications listing doesn't get automatically updated with new implications when the posts are edited or hidden. Sorry, admins? If you do have tooling for this, I hope it can handle this just fine. If not, I simplified it all a little for you.

implications/alias aren't automatically applied, they first need to be approved by the staffs

I'm aware. I was talking about the pending implications/aliases.

The tag alias looking_upwards -> looking_up (forum #283397) has been approved by @bitWolfy.