Implicating erection → aroused
Link to implication

Reason:

erect_clitoris -> aroused

We have the tag, might as well populate it with images holding the characteristics of arousal.
If you can think of any other tags that should imply aroused feel free to add to this

EDIT: The tag implication erection -> aroused (forum #269108) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

You don't need to be aroused to have an erection.

Yeah I'm not entirely sure erect* should be aliased to aroused, since arousal, at least to me, is a pleasurable thing. Someone being raped, for instance, might have an erection but not be experiencing arousal, as I think of it.

-1. morning_wood

-1
cock rings

We should also de-implicate erect_clitoris from aroused as well...

honestly im not sure if we should have the whole aroused tag at all. its very vague and messy tag

Ruikuli said:
honestly im not sure if we should have the whole aroused tag at all. its very vague and messy tag

I mean, horny is disambiguated, what's the difference?

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
I mean, horny is disambiguated, what's the difference?

people could mean that the character has many horns with that tag

Versperus said:
people could mean that the character has many horns with that tag

true.
Still, if we decide to get rid of aroused I'd say alias to horny_(disambiguation).

Versperus said:
people could mean that the character has many horns with that tag

read the horny_(disambiguation) page. nobody was using it for characters with many horns. it was got rid of because it was used for an the exact same abstract subjective thing as aroused is used

Ruikuli said:
read the horny_(disambiguation) page. nobody was using it for characters with many horns. it was got rid of because it was used for an the exact same abstract subjective thing as aroused is used

I mean, I thought that is what it could of been used for
maybe it should be on the wiki aha

The tag implication erection -> aroused (forum #269108) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.