Implicating canine_dildo → animal_dildo
Link to implication

Reason:

(canine->animal) * dildo = (canine_dildo->animal_dildo)

The implication would make sense, but I am not sure if an "animal_dildo" tag would be useful as a group tag on the first place; it seems fairly unused as well, what admittedly doesn't invalidate its possible usefulness but it is worth pointing out.

O16 said:
The implication would make sense, but I am not sure if an "animal_dildo" tag would be useful as a group tag on the first place; it seems fairly unused as well, what admittedly doesn't invalidate its possible usefulness but it is worth pointing out.

Oh hey you! Haven't seen you in forever

Anyways while I see your point, I feel that it could have just as much use as the animal genitalia tags, just specifically for sex toys. This way filtering out or searching specifically for humanoid sex toys or knotted sex toys, etc, would be a breeze

For this though, we'd have to set up a group of other tags that should have these implications of course. Things like equine_dildo, knotted_dildo, etc would imply animal_dildo

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Oh hey you! Haven't seen you in forever

Anyways while I see your point, I feel that it could have just as much use as the animal genitalia tags, just specifically for sex toys. This way filtering out or searching specifically for humanoid sex toys or knotted sex toys, etc, would be a breeze

For this though, we'd have to set up a group of other tags that should have these implications of course. Things like equine_dildo, knotted_dildo, etc would imply animal_dildo

Hi there! I haven't been able to access my account in a while (forgot the password and my email wasn't exactly accessible until recently).

Possibly, although I have my doubts regarding knotted_dildo, since a dildo could be knotted without being based on any actual animal.

O16 said:
Hi there! I haven't been able to access my account in a while (forgot the password and my email wasn't exactly accessible until recently).

Possibly, although I have my doubts regarding knotted_dildo, since a dildo could be knotted without being based on any actual animal.

Ahhh I see. Glad to see you back! I think you weren't even here back when I was given privileged status let alone janitor ahaha. Ah time flies

Anyways while I see what you mean, I think knots would make it inherently at least partially animal-based, even if it were a hybrid penis or sex toy. I think knotted appendages on penises themselves are considered animal genitalia by nature.

Even if not, we can then just exclude the knotted_* stuff and stick with equine_dildo, feline_dildo, etc implying animal_dildo

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Ahhh I see. Glad to see you back! I think you weren't even here back when I was given privileged status let alone janitor ahaha. Ah time flies

Thank you! I was, well, more or less; I saw when you became a privileged and a janitor, but I did so without being able to log in. Kudos for your new position, I see you have done a lot of organizing in regard to tags and wikis (specially species ones).

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Anyways while I see what you mean, I think knots would make it inherently at least partially animal-based, even if it were a hybrid penis or sex toy. I think knotted appendages on penises themselves are considered animal genitalia by nature.

I also thought so originally, but got unsurd after reading the wiki for "animal_genitalia", since it not only says nothing explicitly about fictional hybrids or other species, but the wording on the wiki gives the impression that they aren't included at all.

DiceLovesBeingBlown said:
Even if not, we can then just exclude the knotted_* stuff and stick with equine_dildo, feline_dildo, etc implying animal_dildo

Indeed, that could very well work.