Implicating speech_bubble → dialogue
Link to implication

Reason:

the tag "dialogue" is used when there is any form of spoken text

EDIT: The tag implication speech_bubble -> dialogue (forum #271278) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

Now that I think about it, shouldn't dialogue only be used when multiple characters are conversating? In that case I believe this won't work out.

Nice idea, though (...and avatar too! I'm currently trying to get the final Stray Beads. I was struggling with the demon gate in North Ryoshima Coast yesterday, but I ran out of time at the 10th and final wave so I had to quit. Today that gate is going to be history, though!)

sdrawkcaB said:
Now that I think about it, shouldn't dialogue only be used when multiple characters are conversating? In that case I believe this won't work out.

Nice idea, though (...and avatar too! I'm currently trying to get the final Stray Beads. I was struggling with the demon gate in North Ryoshima Coast yesterday, but I ran out of time at the 10th and final wave so I had to quit. Today that gate is going to be history, though!)

monologue has been aliased to dialogue, afaict it's a tag for all "text" based speech. also thanks :) it's a fun game, great art

speech_bubble -text
speech_bubble -dialogue
This one needs a lot of cleaning up so I'll cherry-pick some examples

post #1827624 post #1827529 post #1834152 post #1822686

-1

MagnusEffect said:
speech_bubble -text
speech_bubble -dialogue
This one needs a lot of cleaning up so I'll cherry-pick some examples

post #1827624 post #1827529 post #1834152 post #1822686

-1

looked at the tag description again. it has "Can also contain pictographics." tacked on at the end after making text the sole focus up until that point. right again Magnus, 2 for 2.

wait, this implication is for implicating Implicating speech_bubble → dialogue, not an implication to text. that should still work right? there should always be dialog going on when there is a speech_bubble even if it's in pictographics, either that or I'm wrong for a different reason than I thought I was. or again maybe the wiki needs clearing up... maybe both

sneezer22 said:
wait, this implication is for implicating Implicating speech_bubble → dialogue, not an implication to text. that should still work right? there should always be dialog going on when there is a speech_bubble even if it's in pictographics, either that or I'm wrong for a different reason than I thought I was. or again maybe the wiki needs clearing up... maybe both

dialogue also excludes pictographics

MagnusEffect said:
dialogue also excludes pictographics

what, why?
This
post #1080921
looks very much like dialogue to me.

sneezer22 said:
wait, this implication is for implicating Implicating speech_bubble → dialogue, not an implication to text. that should still work right? there should always be dialog going on when there is a speech_bubble even if it's in pictographics, either that or I'm wrong for a different reason than I thought I was.

Blank speech bubbles would get tagged as dialogue.

post #1831230 post #1775181 post #1400475

Cane751 said:
Blank speech bubbles would get tagged as dialogue.

post #1831230 post #1775181 post #1400475

we have a winner^^ best argument so far

like in the first pic, is it still dialog if the viewer can't determine what information is being exchanged but there are still bubbles implying a conversation? hard to support that

also, cute freaking Hopps avatar :)

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
what, why?
This
post #1080921
looks very much like dialogue to me.

Pictographics aren't exclusive to speech.

post #1774602 post #1637874 post #1636536

-1

• Dialogue can be had without speech bubble (RPG game dialogue windows, text floating in the air, etc.)
• Speech bubbles can be had without dialogue.

The tag implication speech_bubble -> dialogue (forum #271278) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.