Topic: New Vore tag - flesh_wall

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Hmm, first time posting on forum, hope Im at the right one...

I tried find something similar but found tag like:

stomach: which can leave it pretty ambiguous as someone inside or a focus on the outside aspect of the body, like midriff.

hmm I was thinking about flesh_wall as a tag for vore while inside mouth/stomach/neck/pussy/ass/tail, since the aspec of it is to show while the victim is inside and it being shown as shown being swallowed and while being inside the one that did the vore.

hope I posted right.

Updated by MissChu

Do you mean Character A getting eaten by Character B who was already eaten by Character C? Because that doesn't sound like a wall of flesh at all.

Updated by anonymous

You might need to re-clarify the descriptions of the tags you're suggesting, I'm not really sure I follow.

Updated by anonymous

while imo that thing should have a tag, i dont think flesh wall is good term for it. it sounds like.. room but with walls made out of flesh. which is very different thing.

Updated by anonymous

Dogenzaka said:
I think he's talking about a tag for the internal view of tissues like this: post #1842466

Yes I mean this, the internal shot when totally swallowed.

Updated by anonymous

Yeah wall of flesh sounds like a wall of fleshy appendages, sort of like the one from Terraria.

Dogenzaka said:
I think he's talking about a tag for the internal view of tissues like this: post #1842466

internal tissues sounds like a better fit, honestly.

Updated by anonymous

laranja said:
Yes I mean this, the internal shot when totally swallowed.

What about 'first person prey'? Makes the tag name itself fairly self-explanatory, as tags should be. Or... 'internal first person'? Something along those lines?

Updated by anonymous

MissChu said:
What about 'first person prey'? Makes the tag name itself fairly self-explanatory, as tags should be. Or... 'internal first person'? Something along those lines?

absolutely no. first person tags require the "viewer character" to be at least partially visible in image.

Updated by anonymous

Ruikuli said:
absolutely no. first person tags require the "viewer character" to be at least partially visible in image.

Mm, good point. I forgot about that aspect. Well, we have maw shot which is the camera shot by itself, maybe 'something shot'? We already have internal shot (aliased to internal) for cutaways (cut intos?) during sex.

'Internal vore shot'?

Updated by anonymous

  • 1