I'm trying to remove the blatantly unproven tags on https://e621.net/post/show/1723199 but it's still locked to explicit. What do I do?
Updated by user 22273
Posted under Site Bug Reports & Feature Requests
I'm trying to remove the blatantly unproven tags on https://e621.net/post/show/1723199 but it's still locked to explicit. What do I do?
Updated by user 22273
...why did you remove all pairing tags...
Updated by anonymous
post #1723199
if something looks like sexual activity it gets tagged as explicit even if you can't see genitalia. And that looks like eating ass, soo
Updated by anonymous
Random said:
...why did you remove all pairing tags...
I thought that those were the tags that lock the post to explicit, since they refer to sexual intercourse.
Updated by anonymous
Versperus said:
post #1723199
if something looks like sexual activity it gets tagged as explicit even if you can't see genitalia. And that looks like eating ass, soo
There's no official detail about rimming, just plain facesitting.
Updated by anonymous
TYFFASI said:
There's no official detail about rimming, just plain facesitting.
"If something looks like" and how is face sitting not explicit, especially with no bottoms
Updated by anonymous
TYFFASI said:
There's no official detail about rimming, just plain facesitting.
That's not how it works. Just because you can't see the tongue going into the butt, doesn't mean there's no rimming happening.
Updated by anonymous
I suppose a semi-legitimate question would be: Should rimming be limited to images where the tongue is visibly being used on the anus or its location? Or is it sufficiently implied when facesitting such that the mouth would be in contact with the anus or its location?
Updated by anonymous
literally no tag locks any rating to anything. all rating locks are manually set by priv+ users. also pairing tags apply to p much any sexual or romantic activities between two characters. also character shoving their face between someone's naked ass cheeks seems p explicit to me.
Updated by anonymous