Implicating cum_in_slit → cum
Link to implication

Reason:

in the name

EDIT: The tag implication cum_in_slit -> cum (forum #249142) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

It's also in cum laude. Having cum in the name doesn't necessarily mean it's cum-related.

This one is, though. +1

This has the same problem as the slit tag.

Is it specifically for genital slits, or slits in general?
If former, then it's getting frequently mistagged for cloacas and other stuff.
And if latter, then it overlaps with existing tags (cum_in_cloaca, etc).

Genjar said:
This has the same problem as the slit tag.

Is it specifically for genital slits, or slits in general?
If former, then it's getting frequently mistagged for cloacas and other stuff.
And if latter, then it overlaps with existing tags (cum_in_cloaca, etc).

Does that really matter for the implication? Whether the slit is actually a cloaca, a vagina or a bloody crack in a rock there is still cum in it. +1

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Does that really matter for the implication? Whether the slit is actually a cloaca, a vagina or a bloody crack in a rock there is still cum in it. +1

well, if the tag doesn't have a *precise* usage, then it maybe should be gotten rid of. cum_in_slit's only got 73 posts. it's not really an established tag.

also I am keeping out of the slit/cloaca/anus/etc debate for now.

SnowWolf said:
well, if the tag doesn't have a *precise* usage, then it maybe should be gotten rid of. cum_in_slit's only got 73 posts. it's not really an established tag.

also I am keeping out of the slit/cloaca/anus/etc debate for now.

slit sex is a niche offshoot of the docking tag for creatures like scalies, fish, and other reptile-like creatures there are plenty of tags that are still valid that have less than 50 tags.

snowwolf said:
well, if the tag doesn't have a *precise* usage, then it maybe should be gotten rid of. cum_in_slit's only got 73 posts. it's not really an established tag.

also I am keeping out of the slit/cloaca/anus/etc debate for now.

Or it should be given clear usage guidelines in its wiki page and the tag should be cleaned up.

The tag implication cum_in_slit -> cum (forum #249142) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.