Aliasing dynamax → invalid_tag
Link to alias

Reason:

dynamaxing -> invalid_tag
dynamax_pokemon -> invalid_tag
dynamax_pokémon -> invalid_tag

Apparently it's some new pokemon move or power being tagged based off an ambiguous pink glow around the pokemon, I believe it simpler to invalidate the tag rather than request tag locks off posts.

EDIT: The tag alias dynamax -> invalid_tag (forum #273812) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

You could even remove the glow and ominous clouds and just say "This pokemon is giant because it's dynamax." I'd say alias to macro instead.

Furrin_Gok said:
You could even remove the glow and ominous clouds and just say "This pokemon is giant because it's dynamax." I'd say alias to macro instead.

Doesn't always work, considering there needs to be evidence of macro

Versperus said:
Doesn't always work, considering there needs to be evidence of macro

If there's no evidence of macro there's no evidence of Dynamax. Having an aura is just having an aura, Dynamax is "Macrofication."

Furrin_Gok said:
the glow and ominous clouds

These should be tagged as aura instead. 20+ images tagged as dynamax so far.
Not as much, I'll likely remove it.

The tag alias dynamax -> invalid_tag (forum #273812) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

The bulk update request #3555 is active.

create alias dynamaxing (0) -> dynamax_pokemon (111)
create alias dynamax_pokémon (0) -> dynamax_pokemon (111)
create implication dynamax_pokemon (111) -> pokemon_(species) (513210)

Reason: Since this was rejected, I'm going to assume it's a valid tag and should be aliased together and given the Pokémon species implication.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3555 (forum #349889) has been approved by @slyroon.

faucet said:
The bulk update request #3555 is active.

create alias dynamaxing (0) -> dynamax_pokemon (111)
create alias dynamax_pokémon (0) -> dynamax_pokemon (111)
create implication dynamax_pokemon (111) -> pokemon_(species) (513210)

Reason: Since this was rejected, I'm going to assume it's a valid tag and should be aliased together and given the Pokémon species implication.

So, we're using dynamax_pokemon for pokemon that are currently dynamaxed? Or would dynamax be a better target?

The bulk update request #3555 (forum #349889) has been approved by @slyroon.