Aliasing raping_the_viewer → invalid_tag
Link to alias

Reason:

No real need for this tag when imminent_rape/rape and looking_at_viewer tags can be used instead

EDIT: The tag alias raping_the_viewer -> imminent_rape (forum #274433) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

This tag is a mess. e6 does have posts that could be classified as raping_the_viewer (for example post #310313, post #464209, post #1331460 and post #1514479) but none of those are tagged. Instead everything under this tag is just looking_at_viewer, with an erection sometimes. post #675365 is NOT raping_the_viewer. Nor post #680517 or post #1434046 or post #333044. Whoever has been using this tag (for example this user) just has no idea what they're doing.

I wouldn't invalidate this tag but I would clear it out.

+1 pitch it.

leomole said:
This tag is a mess.

I agree, and I agree with the recommendation to invalidate the tag altogether. The tag is problematic for a few reasons:

• It doesn't fit TWYS at all, as you can't determine whether the viewer would be consenting.
• Most of the sample images I saw didn't actually involve sex so much as some leering male.
• It's frankly creepy.

I'm all for getting rid of it.

I could almost alias it to first_person_view, if it were used by how it sounds like.

Mairo said:
I could almost alias it to first_person_view, if it were used by how it sounds like.

I mean, the one thing that all have in common is
looking_at_viewer

The tag alias raping_the_viewer -> imminent_rape (forum #274433) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.