Implicating unretracted_foreskin → long_foreskin
Link to implication

Reason:

The tag for unretracted_foreskin description lines up to that of long_foreskin. While both these tags are similar, long_foreskin has the perk of not being limited to just having the foreskin completely cover the glans but also having the foreskin extending beyond the glans (meaning it can still be seen) for example this post #1906476

EDIT: The tag implication unretracted_foreskin -> long_foreskin (forum #274369) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

unretracted_foreskin does also apply with flaccid and half-erect dicks and as well as hyper_foreskin and posts where long_foreskin do not apply.

Also wiki pages are not be-all-end-all as they can and usually have been written by individual users with their personal view on how the tag should be used, which can be modified over time, as thus I do not see any reason why long_foreskin should be limited to erection when it can easily be used in half-erect cases like you provided.

So that's a big -1 from me.

Mairo said:
unretracted_foreskin does also apply with flaccid and half-erect dicks and as well as hyper_foreskin and posts where long_foreskin do not apply.

Also wiki pages are not be-all-end-all as they can and usually have been written by individual users with their personal view on how the tag should be used, which can be modified over time, as thus I do not see any reason why long_foreskin should be limited to erection when it can easily be used in half-erect cases like you provided.

So that's a big -1 from me.

I'm a bit confused, long_foreskin isn't limited to just erections since it could apply to flaccid or semi-erect as well. Or are you basically saying that the difference mainly lies when it is flaccid/semi-erect?

Bara-King said:
I'm a bit confused, long_foreskin isn't limited to just erections since it could apply to flaccid or semi-erect as well. Or are you basically saying that the difference mainly lies when it is flaccid/semi-erect?

I think I was tired when I first read the thread and thought it was alias and not implication.

Still, if character does have unretracted_foreskin, what is there to say it's not hyper_foreskin for example or just avarage foreskin when flaccid/half-erect.

The tag implication unretracted_foreskin -> long_foreskin (forum #274369) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.