Implicating dtmh_crossgender → iti_crossgender
Link to implication

Reason:

Tag requires an intersex character to be featured as a different variation of intersex to be valid.

Similar Requests:

ctd_crossgender → iti_crossgender
cth_crossgender → iti_crossgender
ctmh_crossgender → iti_crossgender
htd_crossgender → iti_crossgender
htc_crossgender → iti_crossgender
htmh_crossgender → iti_crossgender
mhtd_crossgender → iti_crossgender
mhtc_crossgender → iti_crossgender
mhth_crossgender → iti_crossgender

EDIT: The tag implication gtmh_crossgender -> iti_crossgender (forum #274637) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

adi you can put everything in one forum post

Versperus said:
adi you can put everything in one forum post

Oh? But, doesn't submitting an implication request automatically make a forum post?

AdiCordo said:
Oh? But, doesn't submitting an implication request automatically make a forum post?

yes, but you can put other related things in the description. And if you style it like

[[example 1]] -> [[example 2]] 

it turns out in the same fashion as the original suggestion. effectively it also keeps things organized

The recommended course of action is to write up the form for one, and then edit that forum post to include the related ones. Admins can always just make the implications if it gets approved.

Versperus said: >insert response<

Furrin_Gok said: >insert response<

Ah, fair enough. Sorry about that. I've done that with this post now.
I'm assuming I don't have to include the previous ones as I've already made the suggestions for them.

A mess to implement, hard to enforce in junction with TWYS, low reward for the effort. I don't think we're gonna pass these.

The tag implication gtmh_crossgender -> iti_crossgender (forum #274637) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.